The Earliest Evidence for the Text of the New Testament - Dirk Jongkind
Though we think of the New Testament as a text that has been copied by hand for 14 centuries, this does not mean that we have to assume that the wording is unreliable. The first argument why this is not a logical conclusion is that of chronology. There is very little time between the writing of the originals and our first complete evidence. In this talk we will have a look at this evidence and see what we can learn from this. See more at http://www.FOCLonline.org FOCLID 8000_3
▶︎
Oldest Bible Manuscripts
▶︎
Can the Old Testament be Trusted Historically? - Peter J. Williams
▶︎
Introduction to the Greek New Testament - Dirk Jongkind
▶︎
Lecture - Dr Peter Williams - New Evidences the Gospels were Based on Eyewitness Accounts
▶︎
Review and Critique of Bernier, Rethinking the Dates of the New Testament
▶︎
Dan Wallace - Recent Discoveries of NT Manuscripts
▶︎
Greek Textual Criticism - Dirk Jongkind
▶︎
Daniel Wallace: Did the Ancient Church Muzzle the Canon?
▶︎
The Formation of the New Testament Canon - Dr Craig Blomberg
▶︎
Formatting the Word of God with Dan Wallace
▶︎
Dr. Bill Mounce on Bible Canonicity and Textual Criticism
▶︎
Dr. Daniel Wallace - The second Great Commission: Constantine and the making of the New Testament
▶︎
New Testament Textual Criticism
▶︎
The Historical Reliability of the New Testament - Dirk Jongkind
▶︎
13. The Historical Jesus
▶︎
Daniel Wallace: Is What We Have Now What They Wrote Then? Part 1 - Biola Chapel
▶︎
Mike Licona THE BASIS OF OUR BIBLICAL TEXT Manuscripts
▶︎
Dr. Dan Wallace Part I: "Erasmus' Greek New Testament"
▶︎
Codex Sinaiticus: A journey in Biblical discovery.
▶︎