ฉ้อโกง vs. ผิดสัญญาทางแพ่ง ต่างกันอย่างไร ? 9 หลักการวินิจฉัยแบบเข้าใจง่าย

When disputes arise, such as default on debt payments, failure to deliver assets according to an agreement, or breach of contract, it always becomes a matter of determining whether such a default constitutes a civil dispute or a criminal offense of fraud. This is because criminal enforcement measures in cases of fraud have significantly greater power than in civil cases. Therefore, the party harmed or denied payment often interprets their case as a case of fraud. Conversely, the party defaulting on payment often interprets or judges their actions as merely a breach of civil contract. So how can we establish a neutral and reasonable basis for judgment? Today, I will explain nine principles for determining whether a breach of agreement or failure to pay a debt constitutes fraud or a breach of civil contract. I hope this will be useful to my viewers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Ekkasit Srisang (Attorney Phet) Head of Pisit Srisang Law Office TEL. 098-2477807 / 087-3357764 http://srisunglaw.com/   / srisungadvocate   LINE ID - @srisunglaw (include the @ symbol) Or click the link below to add LINE: https://lin.ee/KVmQhgu