Is Glock Protecting Itself Instead of Gun Owners??

California and Maryland are moving to restrict the sale of Glock-style pistols, while the Justice Department, gun-rights groups, firearm dealers and individual gun owners fight back in court. But Glock itself is not publicly leading the lawsuits challenging these new restrictions—so where is Glock, and what is the company actually doing? In this video, we break down the California Glock ban, AB 1127, Maryland’s new handgun restriction, California’s handgun roster and the long history of Gen4 and Gen5 Glock pistols being unavailable through ordinary California dealer sales. We also examine Glock’s past fight against microstamping, its involvement in the Peña roster case, its relationship with NSSF, its newer pistol redesigns and the lawsuits Glock is currently fighting over illegal machine-gun conversion devices. Glock is not doing nothing—but its strategy is very different from the public fight being led by FPC, SAF, NRA, gun stores, gun owners and the federal government. Is Glock making a smart legal decision by staying out of the direct ban challenges, or should the company put more of its name, money and influence behind protecting civilian access to its pistols? Join this channel to get access to perks:    / @hegshot87   New Merch drop https://hegshot87.myspreadshop.com/ ATTENTION: All opinions shared are just that, my opinions. I'm not a lawyer nor have I ever claimed to be one I simply commentate on different scenarios to give you examples of what can happen out in the real world.