Lau v Nichols — How Immigrant Students Won Bilingual Education
The case Lau v. Nichols originated in San Francisco, where Chinese immigrant students who spoke little to no English were not receiving adequate language assistance in school. The parents of these students filed a class action lawsuit, arguing that the lack of English language instruction was a form of discrimination under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs that receive federal funding.

▶︎
Language Access since Lau vs. Nichols: Court Cases, Federal Laws and Regulations in history

▶︎
Lau vs. Nichols: A Landmark Case for ELL Education

▶︎
SFUSD Bilingual Education Lau vs Nichols SFGTV San Francisco

▶︎
A historic background of bilingual education

▶︎
50th Anniversary Community Convening to Celebrate Lau v Nichols

▶︎
The First Post-Affirmative Action Class Enters College

▶︎
What do tech pioneers think about the AI revolution? - The Engineers, BBC World Service

▶︎
Ofelia García - Translanguaging

▶︎
Moments in History: Mendez v. Westminster

▶︎
Celebrating the 40th Anniversary of IDEA

▶︎
Lau v. Nichols Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

▶︎
The dark history of the Chinese Exclusion Act - Robert Chang

▶︎
Mendez v. Westminster School District et al, OC Human Relations Legacy Awards

▶︎
Creating bilingual minds | Naja Ferjan Ramirez | TEDxLjubljana

▶︎
Capitalism vs. Socialism: A Soho Forum Debate

▶︎
Braucht Schule Druck? | Agree to Disagree! | ARTE

▶︎
‘Translanguaging Is What Bilinguals and Multilinguals Do’: A Primer for Teachers

▶︎
Why Illegal Immigrants Can Attend Public School | Plyler v. Doe

▶︎
School Segregation and Brown v Board: Crash Course Black American History #33

▶︎
