هل فهمتم لماذا لم يسلّم دمر وأنصار فيديوهات العباسي؟

Do you understand why Damir and his supporters refused to hand over the videos of Hassan al-Abbasi? The video doesn't belong to anyone… this is crime footage. In this video, I explain the point of the post regarding Damir Suleiman and his supporters' refusal to hand over the videos or confirm the facts to Mr. Hassan al-Abbasi. The main point is not to question Hassan al-Abbasi's suffering; he is a victim first and foremost: the uncle of missing children and the brother of a woman who disappeared with her family. But the most important question is: Is it permissible to burden a victim with a video that could ignite the country? And does any researcher have the right to personally hand over crime footage before the investigation and legal verification are complete? The video addresses the difference between sympathizing with victims and holding them responsible for the investigation. It discusses the danger of publishing sensitive material in a country experiencing polarization and the responsibility of official bodies and the Missing Persons Commission in handling this case. Chapters 00:00 Why didn't Damir and his supporters respond to Hassan al-Abbasi? 00:19 Hassan al-Abbasi is a victim who shouldn't be burdened beyond his capacity. 01:48 Why is it impermissible to personally hand over crime footage? 03:14 The danger of polarization and incitement if the video is published without investigation 03:55 Where is the responsibility of the authorities and the Commission for the Missing? 06:16 Why was the harm less than delivering the video directly? #TryingToUnderstand #RaniaAlAbbasi #HassanAlAbbasi #DamarSuleiman #AnsarShahoud #CommissionForTheMissing #MissingInSyria #TransitionalJustice #Syria #CriminalEvidence #CriminalInvestigation #SectarianPolarization #VictimsOfSyria #CrimesOfSyria #SyrianMemory