Türkiye için yeni senaryo! Taşlar yerinden oynayacak... | Kum Saati

This week on Hourglass, Prof. Dr. Mehmet Efe Çaman, Abdülhamit Bilici, and Erdem Gençay, a public prosecutor dismissed by decree, discussed the use of the judiciary as a tool of politics in Turkey, the absolute nullity crisis within the CHP (Republican People's Party), and the ECHR's (European Court of Human Rights) decision regarding Şaban Yasak. The program first addressed the investigation launched after Rahmi Koç's controversial joke, discussing Article 216 of the Turkish Penal Code, hate crimes, and freedom of expression. Erdem Gençay, while evaluating the legal aspects of the investigation, drew attention to the question of who the government is using the law against and who it is protecting. The second part discussed the absolute nullity decision within the CHP, the removal of Özgür Özel from party leadership, and Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu's return to the leadership of the CHP. Gençay stated that this process was a political, not a legal, intervention. The program also examined the CHP's past stance on the injustices against those dismissed by decree and members of the Hizmet Movement, alongside the injustices it is currently experiencing. The final section evaluated the ECHR's decisions regarding Şaban Yasak and Yalçınkaya. It was emphasized that depositing money in Bank Asya, using ByLock, newspaper subscriptions, and school and tutoring center connections cannot be considered crimes in themselves; and that in terrorism charges, coercion and violence must be proven individually. 00:12 Opening: Hourglass 05:21 How is the article on inciting hatred and hostility among the public being used? 08:21 Could the Rahmi Koç investigation have a political background? 10:17 Is the decision of absolute nullity legal or political? 15:11 What should have been done if there was suspicion at the congress? 16:33 Why is Kılıçdaroğlu avoiding the congress? 17:14 Where was the first button wrongly fastened in the CHP decision? 18:54 Has Turkey effectively lost its multi-party system? 22:30 Is there any legal security left in Turkey? 23:47 Should Özgür Özel take back the CHP or form a new party? 29:37 Should the legal battle be waged until the very end? 31:09 Why is the CHP not considered a true social democratic party? 33:13 ECHR decisions and the CHP's silence 33:38 Why is the Şaban Yasak decision critical? 34:29 Has Turkey severed its ties with the rule of law? 36:11 Why can't the executive power be limited? 41:22 What does it mean to wait for a Ministry opinion despite the ECHR decision? 43:24 Are there courts that implement ECHR decisions? 43:56 How should the Şaban Yasak decision be interpreted? 44:59 Why are lawyers watering down the decision? 45:32 Why did the Şaban Yasak decision turn out to be stronger than expected? 47:02 Can schools, tutoring centers, newspapers, unions, and Bank Asya be considered evidence of a crime? 48:07 Did the ECHR Grand Chamber block the second chamber? 48:23 Is the phrase "community a terrorist organization" present in the Yalçınkaya and Şaban Yasak decisions? 49:50 Why doesn't the ECHR write "community is not a terrorist organization"? 52:08 Were weapons found in the homes of 2.5 million people? 52:23 "Net figure: Zero" 53:02 Can Bank Asya, ByLock, bazaars, and tutoring centers be considered evidence? 54:20 The Serkan Gölge example: NASA ID and 1 dollar 57:03 Why are illegalities committed by lawyers? 57:22 Nearly 5,000 judges and prosecutors dismissed and new judicial cadres 59:20 Did the academy and law professors fail the test? 1:00:10 Did the elites, businesspeople, and academia in Turkey fail? 1:03:12 Finale and thanks to the viewers Join this channel to enjoy exclusive benefits:    / @tr724   ► Become a member of our channel: https://buff.ly/3tRtiWl ► Support us:   / tr724   ► Subscribe:    / tr724