High Court Sensational Judgement Over Parents Vs Children | Parents & Senior Citizens Act ABN Legal
High Court Sensational Judgement Over Parents Vs Children | Parents & Senior Citizens Act ABN Legal Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007 The Delhi High Court has held that Section 16(1) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is valid, but must be read to provide for the right of appeal to any of the affected parties. The single-judge bench presided by Justice Pratibha M. Singh was hearing an appeal challenging the order of the Tribunal which had directed the petitioners to pay monthly maintenance of Rs 5,000 each to their mother as monthly maintenance. The bench while dismissing the appeal allowed the petitioners to approach the Appellate Tribunal constituted under the Act to raise any challenge against the impugned order and observed that “anyone aggrieved by an order passed by the Tribunal should be allowed to approach the Appellate Tribunal.” The Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that their mother already had sufficient income on her own and hence, the award of the said maintenance was not in terms of the provisions of the Act. The Court however relied on an earlier order passed by the Court on January 6, 2021 in Amit Kumar v. Kiran Sharma & Anr. where it was observed under: “Section 16 of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter, “Act”) provides for an appellate remedy against an order of the tribunal. However, as per the text of the provision, any senior citizen or parent must prefer such an appeal within sixty days.” The Court also concurred with the interpretation given to Section 16 of the Act by the Punjab and Haryana High Court that the Appellate Tribunal, having been constituted under the Act, anyone aggrieved by an order passed by the Tribunal should be allowed to approach the Appellate Tribunal. ABN Legal gives free legal advice about the law. Here Lawyers give Free Legal Advice on a Range of Matters to people who need it most. Watch #ABNLegal : మీకు ఈ వీడియోలు నచ్చితే #LIKE, చేయండి, మీ #COMMENTS, ను తెలపండి , ఇంకా ఇలాంటి వీడియోస్ మీరు పొందుటకు మా #YOUTUBE ఛానల్ #SUBSCRIBE చేసుకోండి,

పుట్టింటి ఆస్తిలో ఆడపిల్లకు వాటా రాదు | Daughters Legal Rights | Parental Property | Advocate Ramya

Daughter in Law Mother in Law |Advocate Nageshwar Rao| Harassment |SumanTV Information

Advocate Ramya Says About Family Disputes | Nyaya Vedhika | Advocate Ramya Latest Videos

Senior Citizen Act : అమ్మానాన్న వద్దా? జైలులో చిప్పకూడే..!- Story Gate - TV9

2024 - Sai Krishna Azad About Daughters Property Rights | Daughters Have Rights on Parents' Property

‘How Will He Live?’: Karnataka HC Judge Shocked After Husband Earning ₹12K Pays ₹10K As Maintenance

Supreme Court Sensational Judgement Over Parents Vs Children |Parents & Senior Citizens Act |SumanTV

Jaipal Reddy On Visa Scam | Nandu & Madhukar Issue | నందుతోనే డైరెక్ట్ గా మాట్లాడా.! |SumanTV Roshan

Awesome Argue by Young Lawyer, Heated Argument in Court, #MpHighCourt #SupremeCourt #LawChakra

"Don't Play with Fire," the Judge Warned | Mother, I will ensure you get justice. Don't worry!

వీలునామా రాసిన వ్యక్తి చనిపోతే... | సీనియర్ అడ్వకేట్ గోపాలకృష్ణ కళానిధి

High Court Advocate Dr.Bala About Mother Property Rights to Son or Daughter ? | Parents Property

Advocate Chenchu Ramaiah About Property Issues Between Brothers | Father Property Rights To Son

'If She Wants To Spend, Let Her Earn': Wife Demands ₹6,16,300/month From Husband, Judge Raps Lawyer

International Advocate Srnivas Kaveti About Emotional Cases On Senior Citizen Legal Rights |Property

విడాకులకు ఒప్పుకోని భార్య.! షాకిచ్చిన సుప్రీంకోర్టు | SC Ends Marriage Using Article 142 | ABN Legal

Rights of Senior Citizen | Parents against their Children | Kalanidhi Sanjeeva | Socialpost Legal

Supreme Court Key Decision || Priya Chowdary & Advocate Pujari Reveals Facts || Mr Nag

తల్లి ఆస్తి ఎవరికి చెందుతుంది..? | Mother Property Rights to Son or Daughter ? | SumanTV Info

