¿Jueces o cazadores patrimoniales? Ley de extinción de dominio - Dr. Giammpol Taboada | #19 LH

⚖️ How far can the State go when it comes to extinguishing assets? Asset forfeiture has been presented as an anti-corruption tool... but is it truly patrimonial justice or an ideologized model that violates rights? In this interview, Dr. Giammpol Taboada Pilco speaks with Leoncio Costilla and, based on his judicial experience, exposes the legal loopholes, constitutional tensions, and political risks of the system. 🔹 What is revealed in this episode? How the model was imported without adaptation to the Peruvian context The problem of retroactivity and its clash with the Constitution SNEED manuals and their doctrinal burden Politicization and selectivity in the application of the law The role of the judge in a system that is uncomfortable questioning 🎯 Why is this content relevant? Because it opens a debate that few publicly address and exposes the contradictions of a mechanism that continues to operate without sufficient constitutional oversight. 🗣️ Your opinion also counts Comment, share your position, and propose upcoming topics or guests. Legal discussions are enriched when they are questioned, not when they are repeated. 👍 If you find this space valuable, support the content with a like, share it, and subscribe for more critical and well-argued interviews.