Fit bit air copy

Google's new Fitbit Air costs £85 once. No subscription. Ever. After nearly 6 years of paying £169 a year for a Whoop, that made me ask a serious question — am I wasting my money? So I tested both devices side by side for several weeks, tracking the same metrics: HRV, sleep, and resting heart rate. Not to see if they gave identical numbers, but to see if the trends matched. Because trends are what actually change behaviour. In this video I cover: How the build and fit compares between the two devices Whether the Fitbit Air data is accurate enough to trust How sleep tracking and HRV data compares week by week What the Fitbit Air is missing (and whether it actually matters) The honest cost comparison over 5 years Which one I'd actually recommend depending on where you are in your fitness journey The verdict: The Fitbit Air is a more primitive device, but it gives you everything you actually need. The Whoop is better in almost every area — but is it £700+ better over 5 years? 🏋️ We're OPEX Bristol — a semi-private personal training gym on Duckmoor Road, Ashton Gate, Bristol. We offer coaching in person and remotely, using data like this to inform your training and get you better results. 📍 Based in Bristol? Come and train with us: opexbristol.com 🌍 Anywhere in the world? Ask us about remote coaching. Chapters: 00:00 — The £85 vs £169 question 00:47 — What I'm actually testing (and how) 01:06 — The three things Fitbit Air has to prove 01:28 — Why I've been paying for Whoop for 6 years 02:21 — Build and fit comparison 02:54 — Sleep data compared week by week 03:36 — HRV trends — do they match? 04:08 — App comparison — more data vs useful data 04:41 — What Whoop has that Fitbit Air doesn't (yet) 05:34 — Answering the three questions 06:35 — The honest verdict 07:20 — Who should buy which one