【民法】契約不適合責任が心底わかる動画｜代金減額と1年ルールの罠？権利のトラブルをイラスト解説！｜解除後の後始末（原状回復と損害賠償）についても徹底的にわかりやすく解説してます！

[About this video] This video is a correction video (the previous video has been made private). In the previous video, I confused "① Interest on restoration to original condition" and "② Damages," which are actually completely different things. ① Interest attached to the purchase price = "Restoration to original condition (return of unjust enrichment)" Since the contract was nullified, the seller was holding and managing someone else's purchase price (making a profit). Therefore, the nature of interest under Article 545, Paragraph 2 is that "I will return it to the original owner (Pig-kun) along with the investment profits (interest) from the period I (Cat-kun) held it." This is not damages. ② Apartment rent, etc. = "Damages based on breach of contract" Simply restoring the property to its original condition does not cover the actual damages suffered by the buyer (Pig-kun) (such as apartment rent that he should not have had to pay). Therefore, the Civil Code stipulates that "even if a contract is terminated, a separate claim for damages may be made (the exercise of the right of termination does not preclude a claim for damages)." This is Article 545, Paragraph 4 of the Civil Code. In this case, Pig can first say to Cat, "Give me back the money I paid! Oh, and since I could have invested my money, you should also return the investment gains! The investment gains should cover the period from when I paid you until you actually returned it!" (①). Furthermore, he can say, "Also, because of you, I had to pay apartment rent that I wouldn't have had to pay otherwise, so you should also pay that rent as damages!" (②). In this way, I mistakenly explained that a claim for money that should actually be made in two parts could be made in one part. This is entirely due to my lack of understanding. I sincerely apologize for providing incorrect information after you took the time to watch the video. This video corrects this mistake! Thank you so much to the following people for pointing this out: kumiko-san And to those who left Super Thanks and comments on the previous video: Morimoto-san Iruka🐬-san Yukigon-san Nao-san Mac Hideki-san Lily-san Mizusawa Sophie-san Obi-san Monchon-san Thank you so much! [Video Table of Contents] 00:00 Opening and Announcement of Correction Video 00:41 Review of Lesson 7: Non-conformity of Goods (Type, Quality, Quantity) 01:26 Basic Flow of the Right to Demand Supplementary Performance and the Right to Demand Price Reduction 04:08 Article 565: Non-conformity Regarding Rights (Partial Sale of Property Belonging to Another Person, etc.) 05:51 Relationship between Sale of Property Belonging to Another Person and Article 565 07:29 Surveying Errors and Claims for Price Increase (Possibility of Analogical Application) 09:17 Troubles in Cases Without Leasehold Rights and Claims for Supplementary Performance/Termination 10:58 Post-Termination Settlement: Obligation to Restore to Original Condition (Article 545) and Return of Interest 12:49 Termination and Claims for Damages (Late Payment Penalties, etc.) 14:40 The Trap of the 1-Year Rule: Things with and Without Time Limits (Article 566) 17:21 Past Exam Practice (8 Questions Total) 17:24 Question 1: Sale of All Property Belonging to Another Person and Time Limit 18:29 Question 2: Sale of Partial Property Belonging to Another Person and Price Reduction 19:37 Question 3: Quantity Excess and Claim for Price Increase 20:00 Question 4: Starting Point for Time Limit on Warranty Liability 20:48 Question 5: Quality Nonconformity and the One-Year Rule 21:44 Question 6: Quantity Shortfall and Application of the One-Year Rule 22:19 Question 7: Relationship between the One-Year Rule and the Statute of Limitations 23:10 Question 8: Absence of Easement and Time Limit 23:38 Ending