Dionysus vs Everybody Else Rule Following Argument

Rule Following Argument against physicalism gets brought up and Dionysus claimed he understood it despite being told multiple times over the course of a few days that he didn't. He proved he did understand it and everyone else doesn't know philosophy and was wrong by posting a link video of someone talking about Immanuel Kant. When asked to explain the argument Jack Angstreich says that what Dio is saying is gibberish. Jack started to laugh and mock him. Dionysus didn't given in and then the Realistic Nihilist started screaming at him. JOIN GODLESS DEBATE DISCORD SERVER:   / discord   Dionysus continued to want to debate it. He runs his interpretation of the argument and ends up going through Jack, Josh, Alex, Danny, Josh, IX, Fox, and Pogan one at a time and they all disagree with Dio that the rule following argument is an epistemic issue. Link Dio posted about Behaviorism that he thought showed the rule following argument was understood by him and no other: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27759528... Dio quoted "Radical behaviorism is generally sufficient for the prediction and control of behavior in the laboratory and its applications, but it fails to provide an explanation of behavior since it cannot deal with the personal level of explanation, the continuity of behavior, and the delimitation of behaviorist interpretations. Only the inclusion of intentional terms can achieve these ends. An intentional account cannot succeed, however, without the incorporation of a behavioral criterion for the ascription of intentional content based on the analysis of systematic environment–behavior relationships." #jackangstreich #physicalism