Matt Dillahunty and "Claims aren't evidence" (REBUTTED)
In this episode Trent responds to atheist Matt Dillahunty's claim that "claims aren't evidence" when used against doctrines like the Resurrection. To support this podcast: / counseloftrent To read transcripts: https://catholic.com/audio/cot
▶︎
Is belief in the Resurrection reasonable? Trent Horn Vs Matt Dillahunty Debate
▶︎
Debate: Did Jesus Rise From the Dead? - Trent Horn vs Alex O'Connor
▶︎
Is Belief in the Resurrection Unreasonable? Mike Winger vs. Matt Dillahunty
▶︎
Caller Has the HARDEST Time Understanding EVIDENCE | Matt Dillahunty & Darante LaMar
▶︎
Answering Atheist Memes and Quotes
▶︎
"7 False Catholic Teachings" (REBUTTED)
▶︎
REFUTING a Rabbi on the Resurrection (REUPLOAD)
▶︎
Why “Christians” Hate Dan McClellan
▶︎
Atheist Debates - Alex O'Connor and Joseph Schmid shockingly wrong on Claims, Evidence and Science
▶︎
Answering a Muslim Apologist
▶︎
The Atheist Experience 29.01 with Forrest Valkai and Seth Andrews (@TheThinkingAtheist)
▶︎
5 Atheist Double Standards
▶︎
Every Argument For Atheism
▶︎
Destiny FINALLY Debates Dillahunty, Gets Stumped w/ Hardest Question In Existence
▶︎
The "Evil God" Challenge (REBUTTED)
▶︎
Can A Christian Lose Their Salvation? A Debate With Trent Horn & Dr. James White (Part 1)
▶︎
Christians Did Not Like My Video on Wes Huff/Hell! 28 Responses
▶︎
Was the Resurrection a "Collective Delusion"? (Jesus vs. Bigfoot)
▶︎
Endlich haben wir die Antwort auf Ifas Hass gegenüber Anni
▶︎