False Choice-of-Law Clauses: When Courts Ignore What Your Contract Says
Episode Summary: In this episode of Litigation & Capital, host Steven Mirsky, founder of Mirsky Corporate Advisors, and co-host Sean O'Connor delve into the complexities of choice of law clauses in contracts. They explore why courts might disregard the law selected by parties and how such decisions can reshape disputes. Steven outlines the high burden of proof required to challenge a choice of law provision, especially when it contradicts a state's fundamental policy. The discussion covers the intricacies of section 187 of the Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws, the importance of understanding the relationship between the chosen law and the parties, and the potential red flags that might indicate a choice of law provision won't survive judicial scrutiny. This episode is crucial for business leaders and legal professionals navigating high-stakes contracts, providing insights into protecting their interests and understanding the legal landscape. Key Timestamps: 00:01 – Introduction 00:26 – Importance of Choice of Law Clauses 00:50 – Courts' Threshold Issues 01:55 – High Burden of Proof in Litigation 02:23 – Fundamental Policy Violations 03:19 – Factors Courts Consider 04:25 – Indicators of Avoiding Scrutiny 05:10 – Role of State Registration 06:07 – Relationship Between Parties and Law 07:02 – Economic Structure vs. Legal Classification 08:23 – Court Preferences in Jurisdiction 09:09 – Judges' Approach to Contractual Provisions 10:19 – Impact of Aggressive Financing Arrangements 12:19 – Presumption Against Illegal Contracts 13:41 – Red Flags in Choice of Law Provisions About the Show: Litigation & Capital is a podcast designed for business leaders and legal professionals navigating the complex world of high-stakes legal issues. Hosted by Steven Mirsky, founder of Mirsky Corporate Advisors, the show breaks down intricate legal concepts affecting companies earning $10 to $100 million annually. Each episode aims to turn legal complexity into leverage, helping listeners protect what they've built. With a focus on clarity and actionable insights, Litigation & Capital equips its audience with the knowledge to make informed decisions in the ever-evolving legal landscape. #LitigationAndCapital #StevenMirsky #ChoiceOfLaw #ContractLaw #LegalStrategy

How Proctor’s texts in Karen Read lawsuit could free dangerous criminals

Understanding Disability Definitions for Federal Employees

The Guaranty Trap: How “Limited” Guarantees Become Unlimited Liability

The Family Home, the Shore House, and the Cabin: What Happens to Real Estate in Your Estate Plan?

What Judges Actually Notice in the First 90 Seconds

Oral Agreements in Pennsylvania Business: When a Handshake Deal Becomes a Legal Problem

Where's the Economy Heading in 2026? Chapman University Forecast | Fadel Lawandy

Unconscionability in High-Dollar Commercial Deals: When Sophisticated Parties Still Get Protected

LAWYER: When Police Say "Safety Check" — Say THESE 5 Words

Swimming with Sharks: Navigating Finance Agreements

How Probate Works in Idaho and What Families Should Expect

June 11, 2026 ONLINE Board Meeting

Education Is the Moat with Guest Eric Poirier | Ep. 109

Understanding Severance Agreements: What Employers Don’t Tell You

How to Represent Myself: What Does a Judge Expect Me To Know?

Last Lecture: Robert Sitkoff on resolving disputes through law, not ‘baseball bat’

FEHB Changes Every Federal Employee Needs to Know With Ann Vanderslice

OCEA Membership Meeting — County Negotiations — May 27, 2026

Return to the Vault | State of the Real Property Section

