CAROL CAPEL vs BIÓLOGO HENRIQUE - Conexão e Litispendência

In today's video, I analyze a decision involving Carol Capel and the biologist Henrique, in which a procedural issue gained prominence. After already filing two lawsuits, Carol filed a third. In response, the judge ordered the plaintiff's lawyer to comment on the possible existence of connection and lis pendens between the claims. In their response, the defense argued that there was neither lis pendens nor connection and defended that all proceedings should continue independently. One of the arguments presented was the need to maintain the individual numbering of each case for use with the YouTube platform, in order to prevent the removal of the respective video. Despite these arguments, the judge concluded that there was a connection between two of the actions and ordered the consolidation of the cases for joint processing. In the video, I explain what connection and lis pendens are, why the judge requested this statement, what the plaintiff's arguments were, and the grounds that led the judge to decide to consolidate two of the claims. I also comment on the practical implications of this decision and what it may mean for the progress of the case. _____________________________________________________________________ STRATEGY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ITEM FOR PREPARATION If you are a law graduate or student and have not yet passed the OAB exam, your study strategy may be wrong! In fact, if you are preparing and not getting results on the exam, I'll be honest with you: YOUR PREPARATION STRATEGY IS COMPLETELY WRONG! I have prepared a complete material with a very simple and quick strategy to implement. Many subscribers here on the channel have already used and approved the PREPARATION METHOD that guides you to study only what is on the exam. https://gabrielpacheco-adv.kpages.onl... ______________________________________________________________________ #biólogohenrique #carolcapel #processo