How do you certify Rust code for DO-178C?
Free DO-178C verification handbook: https://www.rapitasystems.com/do178c-... Learn more about object code verification: https://www.rapitasystems.com/object-... As the aerospace industry evolves, so too must the tools and languages we use to build its most critical systems. Rust is emerging as a powerful, memory-safe alternative to C/C++, but how can it be used in environments governed by rigorous standards like DO-178C? In this exclusive webinar, AdaCore and Rapita Systems will demonstrate how their tools GNAT Pro for Rust and the Rapita Verification Suite (RVS) can enable the safe, certifiable use of Rust in avionics software. What You’ll Learn How Rust’s safety features align with DO-178C objectives What makes GNAT Pro for Rust suitable for certification How RVS tools verify Rust code with zero-footprint techniques How to generate traceability, coverage, and timing artifacts for audits How AdaCore and Rapita support tool qualification and regulatory engagement Practical steps to begin evaluating and certifying Rust-based software _______________________________________________________ Connect with us on LinkedIn: / rapita-systems About Rapita Systems Rapita Systems group provides on-target software verification tools and services globally to the embedded aerospace and automotive electronics industries. Its solutions, including requirements-based functional testing, structural code coverage analysis and worst-case execution time analysis, help to increase software quality and deliver evidence to meet safety and certification objectives and reduce costs for DO-178C and ISO 26262 projects. The group provides the world’s leading commercial solution for timing analysis to support the certification of multicore systems, including systems developed to meet AC 20-193, AMC 20-193 and AA-22-01 standards.

What is object code verification in DO-178C? (and how do you do it?)

How to do worst-case execution time analysis for DO-178C | A case study

How to get 100% code coverage for DO-178C | A case study

What does AC 20-193 mean for your multicore project? What changed from CAST-32A?

SCC Webinar: The Modern Data Centre Blueprint - From Consolidation to Orchestration

Turing Award Winner: Disagreeing with Google, Postgres, Future Problems | Mike Stonebraker

Zig 2026: No-AI Policy, $670K Foundation, Left GitHub & Why Zig Isn’t 1.0 - Andrew Kelley Explains

I Hacked This Temu Router. What I Found Should Be Illegal.

Linus Torvalds: AI Is Changing Linux Fast

We're 99.9% sure this pattern is true, but no one can prove it

Co-Creator of Haskell: Useless vs Useful Languages, Rust vs C, Functional Programming | Simon Jones

Why HMRC Doesn’t Want You to Understand This

England – Kroatien Highlights | Gruppe L, FIFA WM 2026 | sportstudio

How to understand and verify multicore interference for DO-178C

Creator of C++: Bell Labs, Negative Overhead Abstraction, Mistakes | Bjarne Stroustrup

The Mind Behind Linux | Linus Torvalds | TED

Out of the box solution for multicore analysis

Trump verrät wahren Grund für Frieden & dankt sogar Putin!

Union types in C# | DEM304

