Is This The Best Alternative to Kodak Portra 400?
Kodak Ultramax is often overlooked when it comes to 35mm film stocks in favour of Portra 400, but is it really all that bad and why aren't more people using it as their daily go to film? Ideal for point and shoot cameras while also being amazing for SLR's, why does everyone seem to be sleeping on Ultramax? Somewhat of a ranty video focusing in on the benefits or Ultramax 400 in comparison to its main competition Portra 400. Not an in depth side by side comparison but my thoughts and why I think you should take note. If you have any questions please leave them in the comments and i will get back to you with an answer. My Photography: https://www.maxlamdin.com / the_maxines Thanks for watching

▶︎
The Best Affordable 35mm Film || Fujifilm Superia 400 vs. Kodak Ultramax 400

▶︎
NEW Kodak Gold in 120 vs. Portra 400 - Side by Side Comparison

▶︎
Kodak Ultramax 400 - Still the Same in 2026?

▶︎
Ranking the BEST Film Stocks! | 35mm Tier List

▶︎
KodaColor is BACK | Kodak’s Newest (Oldest) Color Negative Film

▶︎
Why YOU should shoot film in 2026

▶︎
My Favorite 35mm Film Stocks Ranked!

▶︎
Kodak Vision 500T | Budget Friendly Portra??

▶︎
SX-70 vs 600 film: Why the debate you've heard is very likely wrong.

▶︎
Kodak Ultramax 400 VS Kodak Portra 400

▶︎
PORTRA 400 vs ULTRAMAX 400!! Which one is right for you? | 35mm Film Comparison, Film Photography

▶︎
Kodak UltraMax 400 Color Negative Film Review | All About Film

▶︎
Whats the best cheap color film? (Ultramax vs Pro Image vs Gold vs Color Plus)

▶︎
Which film stock should you buy?

▶︎
What's The Deal With Film Photography?

▶︎
CineStill vs Lomo vs Portra

▶︎
Comparing Fuji 400 (Made in USA) to Kodak Ultramax: Are they really the same?

▶︎
Streets of Hong Kong with Portra 400 & 800

▶︎
Kodak Ektar - My favourite colour negative film!

▶︎
