Did Paul Invent Christianity? Islam’s Biggest Lie EXPOSED

Islam’s standard accusation is put on the table: Paul corrupted Christianity, abandoned the Law of Moses, and invented a new religion. Using Acts 1, Acts 21, Galatians, and 1 Corinthians, the debate unpacks whether Paul contradicted the apostles — or whether Muslims misunderstand the New Testament entirely. But here’s the real issue: if Paul is rejected because he received revelation after Jesus and wasn’t among the Twelve, then Islam faces a far bigger problem — Muhammad came 600 years later claiming to correct both Jesus and Paul. This full debate exposes the Islamic double standard on revelation, authority, and scripture. ✝️ Help Us Defend the Faith 💰 Support us via PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted... ✅ Join the Revival — Become a channel member:    / @speakerscornerrevival   ❤️ Support monthly on Patreon:   / speakerscornerrevival   TOPICS COVERED Is Galatians more reliable than Acts? Did Paul and Peter disagree in Antioch? What happened in Acts 21 with James? Did Paul tell Jews to abandon Moses? What does “the law is a curse” actually mean? Why was Matthias chosen instead of Paul? What were the qualifications for apostleship? Did Paul contradict Jesus? Did Paul invent Christianity for Gentiles? What does 1 Corinthians 9 really mean? Was Paul self-appointed? Vision of Damascus vs Islamic revelation claims Do Muslims apply the same standard to Muhammad? Does Islam depend on attacking Paul to survive? 📖 SCRIPTURE USED IN THE FULL DEBATE Acts 1:21–22 “It is necessary to choose one of the men who have been with us the whole time the Lord Jesus was living among us…” Acts 21:20–24 “They have been informed that you teach all the Jews… to turn away from Moses… Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you…” Galatians 2:11 “I opposed Cephas to his face…” Galatians 3:13 “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law…” 1 Corinthians 9:20–21 “To the Jews I became like a Jew…” [00:00] Opening Claim: “Galatians Is More Reliable Than Acts” Islamic framing begins — attempting to create contradiction inside Scripture. [04:30] Paul vs Peter? The Antioch Incident Galatians 2 is used to imply apostolic division. [09:00] Did the Apostles Disagree Theologically? Distinguishing personal conduct correction from doctrinal contradiction. [13:30] Why Was Paul Not Chosen to Replace Judas? Acts 1 qualifications explained. (Matthias chosen based on earthly ministry criteria — not a universal apostolic rule.) [18:00] Damascus Road — Vision or Fabrication? The legitimacy of post-resurrection appearances examined. [23:00] Acts 21 — James Confronts Paul? Full reading destroys the “rebuke” narrative. Rumours vs verified doctrine clarified. [31:00] “The Law Is a Curse” — What Did Paul Mean? Galatians in covenantal context. Law as condemning under sin — not evil in itself. [37:00] Circumcision & Gentiles Jerusalem Council background (Acts 15 implications). Gentile inclusion without Mosaic covenant. [43:00] Did Paul Invent Christianity? Examining continuity between Jesus’ teaching and Pauline theology. [48:00] The Islamic Double Standard If Paul is false, then what about: [52:00] Final Clash — Authority & Revelation #speakerscorner #speakerscornerrevival #ChristianApologetics #islamdebate #DefendPaul