Constitutional Chisme: Miranda v. Arizona

Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school! This week, we are covering the landmark case _Miranda v. Arizona_. The case raised important questions about the constitutional rights of individuals during police interrogations and whether statements made by a suspect in custody are admissible when the suspect was not informed of their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and Sixth Amendment right to an attorney. The Supreme Court's decision established the  *Miranda warnings*, requiring law enforcement to advise individuals of their rights before conducting a custodial interrogation. Just a friendly reminder: nothing discussed on this podcast constitutes legal advice. We are not your lawyers! Use code PASSWITHPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering. Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli