Valeria Márquez: nada era lo que parecía

Valeria Márquez was murdered during a TikTok live stream. But the most disturbing thing wasn't just how it happened, but everything that happened afterward. According to the Relatos Forenses Podcast, the crime shows signs of having been planned down to the smallest detail: from a stuffed animal used as a marker to identify her, to the subsequent publication in HD of the original video… with Valeria already dead. As a psychologist, today I analyze this case from a criminal and forensic psychology perspective, to show you why this wasn't an impulsive crime, but rather a staged crime, possibly designed to send a message. And the most disturbing thing: that message could have been directed at all of us. Are we normalizing violence on social media? What kind of personality needs to leave everything recorded, edited… and published? Join my Telegram so you don't miss a thing: https://linktr.ee/psicologagemma My book "Narcisism Revealed" → https://gemmaalbarracin.com/libro-nar... Join my healing program → https://www.liberatedelnarcisismo.com/ Connect with the community → https://gemmaalbarracin.com/ Official channel merch → Discover the t-shirts and mugs here 📩 Receive exclusive content in your email → https://gemmaalbarracin.com/ 📢 Important: This content is educational and intended to offer a psychological perspective on public artistic expressions, as part of an informative approach. It does not represent a clinical diagnosis or a personal judgment of the artists. If you are going through a difficult personal situation, I encourage you to seek professional support from a qualified specialist. Psychology is also communicated, reflected upon, and shared. Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Right to Quote: The inclusion in one's own work of excerpts from other works of a written, audio, or audiovisual nature, as well as of individual works of figurative visual or photographic nature, is permissible, provided that the works have already been published and their inclusion is for the purpose of citation or for analysis, commentary, or critical judgment. Such use may only be made for teaching or research purposes, to the extent justified by the purpose of such incorporation and indicating the source and the name of the author of the work used.