Recourse Against Arbitral Award: Section 34| Public Policy & Patent Illegality

In this in-depth video, we explain Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which allows parties to challenge an arbitral award under specific grounds. We not only break down the statutory text but also analyze important judicial interpretations and landmark Supreme Court decisions. 🔍 What You'll Learn: ✅ Grounds for setting aside arbitral awards under Section 34 ✅ Meaning and scope of Public Policy & Patent Illegality ✅ Understanding Arbitrability of Disputes – what can and cannot be referred to arbitration ✅ Key judicial developments shaping Indian arbitration law ⚖️ Landmark Cases Discussed: Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corporation Booz Allen and Hamilton v. SBI Home Finance Associate Builders v. DDA Ssangyong Engineering v. NHAI  Patel Engineering Ltd. v. North Eastern Electric Power Corp. #indianlaw #clatprep #adr #arbitration #lawaspirants #legalseries #lawstudent #legalawareness #legaleducation #rajverma #Section34 #ArbitralAward #PublicPolicy #PatentIllegality #Arbitrability #VidyaDrolia #BoozAllen #SsangyongEngineering #AssociateBuilders #PatelEngineering #IndianArbitration #ArbitrationAct1996 #ADR #LegalEducation #LawStudents #SupremeCourtCases #ArbitrationIndia