(374)🧡- 아..뒤돌리기 좀 더 편하게 치는 방법 없을까? 당연히 있죠. 이거 미쳤다~

Hello everyone. This is Foldrang. Please subscribe and like, and we'll begin the Foldrang lesson. Today, I've prepared this. Yes, a backflip. I think this is the most annoying layout for our subscribers. First, let's check the attack line using the "f&h system." Yes, roughly, using the "50→20" method, you can slightly raise one cushion. The target point used at the 50 point of the "f&h system" is the "2:00 3-tip." While this may vary slightly depending on table conditions, the "2:00 3-tip" is the most effective. The current situation is that the cue ball's angle of incidence is "negative," increasing the pushback. Therefore, the "2:00 3-tip" is not a good option. You should lower it to the "3:00 3-tip." The most suitable thickness for "a" is "½." Yes, let's try "½" for now. Yes, this is exactly what we're concerned about. We've accurately captured the first cushion, but the line becomes ridiculously long. This is due to the drag caused by the negative angle of incidence. To solve this, we typically use the lower target point to pull the first cushion forward. The thickness is approximately "⅓", and the target point is "4:30 3 tips." Yes, we've captured the second cushion point precisely, but the reflection angle is too large and the shot ends up coming up short. This is due to the reflection angle characteristic of the lower target point. Of course, you can achieve a spectacular success. But the odds are incredibly slim. Line changes with a pull-in using the lower target point are much more variable than you might think. The range of variation is too great depending on the stroke impact characteristics, speed, and thickness. In other words, consistent line control is extremely difficult. Furthermore, a "⅓" thickness carries a very high risk of a kiss. The thickness you absolutely should not use in the current layout is "⅓". But if you use "¼", you'll lose traction. Similarly, you're worried about the kiss. Yes, this is exactly our concern... Let's watch this video. Yes, it's the "Spin Shot." The thickness is about "⅔", and ours is "3:00 3 Tips." Let's first look at the direction of travel for the single-target ball. The single-target ball separation angle is about 20 degrees. It's "⅔" thick. Let's start with the first cushion. This is almost identical to the "f&h system" line value. It's actually lower than the initial "a" position. It seemed like it would be too long, but it worked. It's a miracle that only a spin shot can create. Yes, the first cushion point used the same line value as the "f&h system." If the spin applied to the cue ball is the typical "3:00 3-tip" spin rate, the path would be (a). Here, the typical spin rate refers to the spin rate when the cue ball is ½" thick. In other words, it's the spin rate that creates the most familiar reflection angle. Yes, with a "½" thickness and our "3:00 3-tip," we can easily capture the 1-cushion "a". However, we would end up with line (a). The spin rate is woefully inadequate. The most notable characteristic of a "spin shot" is its powerful spin rate. If we were to measure this in terms of the number of tips, a "6-tip" would be sufficient. The maximum transverse spin rate is 3-tip. Yes, a tip alone can never produce the spin rate of a 6-tip. To produce the spin rate of a 6-tip, the repulsive force of the thickness is required. It's about ⅔" thick. In other words, to create a "spin shot," you absolutely must aim for a "⅔" thickness. But there's a problem. A "⅔" thickness means pushing. If the target point is even slightly toward the top, it will inevitably be pushed. On the other hand, if it's toward the bottom, it will be pulled significantly. This is why using thicker thicknesses is so strongly discouraged. When aiming for a "3:00 3-tip" target point at a "½" thickness, the separation angle is exactly 45 degrees. Increasing the thickness to "⅔" reduces the separation angle by about 5 degrees, resulting in a 40-degree separation angle. Basically, a transverse target point is a target point with almost no pushing or pulling. However, a thicker target point like "⅔" will experience some pushing. This is why the separation angle is narrower. However, a transverse target point doesn't always produce a 40-degree separation angle. This varies depending on the stroke characteristics. This is because achieving a perfect target point in a fast stroke is difficult. Due to stroke habits, such as upstrokes and downstrokes, the target point is highly likely to change. This means it could be either the upper or lower target point. Therefore, at ⅔" thickness, the separation angle varies from about 40 to 45 degrees. That's a difference of about 5 points. This variability in a single cushion is concerning. One wonders if this "spin shot" is worth it. Yes, let me examine this question. The thickness and target point are exactly the same. However, the single cushion is 5 points ahead of the previous position. The target point shifts downward, causing a slight d...