ADRC vs PID: motion control with soft connection between the motor and load.
This video shows the undisputed advantage of ADRC over PID and other techniques. The load is connected to the motor via a soft spring. The resonant frequency is less than 10 Hz but otherwise unknown. With ADRC, the closed-loop bandwidth is made greater than the unknown resonant frequency! The results show a rigidly controlled load, as though the spring effect was not even there.
▶︎
Inside the YASA YM360: Axial Flux Motor Engineering Explained
▶︎
EEVblog 1752 - Texas Instruments SCREWED UP the NE5532!
▶︎
Penny Helps Sheldon Solve His Equation | The Big Bang Theory
▶︎
ADRC vs PID
▶︎
Active Disturbance Rejection Control the intuitive way part 1
▶︎
7 Microcontrollers You Should NEVER Use in a Product
▶︎
The EU Chips Act Has Failed
▶︎
I Found Hidden Wires… Then the CTO Emailed Me.
▶︎
Why Are Linux I/O Devices Called TTY?
▶︎
AI Billionaires Are Starting to Panic
▶︎
The most used operating system in the world is not Linux
▶︎
Once You Understand it, You Will Think Everything Else is Silly - Toyota E-CVT
▶︎
Rowan Atkinson's Brilliant Humor Leaves Celebrities in Tears!
▶︎
The PID Killer: Why You Should Switch to ADRC
▶︎
Active Disturbance Rejection Controllers (ADRC) for Speed Control of a PMSM
▶︎
Reaching 10⁻⁶ mbar for my homemade electron microscope
▶︎
Why Put A Capacitor Across The Diode? Here's Why!
▶︎
How Maxwell's Equations Were Discovered
▶︎
ADRC vs. PID: motion control ( first performed in 1997）
▶︎