The Bite of 87; A Retrospective on FNAF's Oldest Mystery

FNAF theories have existed ever since the release of the first game, but back then, there was no bigger mystery than the elusive Bite of 87. It’s possibly the oldest question mark raised by the franchise, and thus, one which has been talked about to death. Discussion on it may have slowed down over the years, but many discuss it to this day. So, indulge with me in this exercise in memory, so we can learn together how this theory has evolved, and how it may have changed FNAF theorizing forever. Old mysteries: 00:00 The Bite of ‘87: 00:35 What does FNAF 1 tell us?: 1:15 Ruling out Chica and Bonnie: 1:37 Foxy; the first main candidate: 2:15 Freddy; a strange alternative: 3:00 IT’S HIM: 3:34 Who did it?: 4:24 Babe, wake up, FNAF 2 just dropped: 5:21 A new question; the victim: 5:40 The culprit; a theory in crisis: 7:08 Something borrowed, something new; the Toys: 8:00 Mangle: 8:55 Mangle!87 has been accepted: 10:50 Babe, wake up, new FNAF teaser just dropped: 11:33 Was it me?: 11:53 WAS THAT THE BITE OF ‘87?!: 13:20 WAS THAT NOT THE BITE OF ‘87?!: 14:31 WAS THAT THE BITE OF ‘83?!: 15:05 The slow migration to Two Bites: 16:08 Sister Location’s big reveal: 16:24 1983 is official: 16:46 The consequences of Two Bites (MY OPINION): 17:00 How the Bite of ‘87 discourse changed as well: 18:48 Toy Chica: 19:22 My opinion on ToyChica!87: 22:52 Two answers, again: 24:00 A third culprit appears!: 24:08 Withered Chica: 24:20 Why W;Chica!87 doesn’t work: 24:40 Back to two… and that’s it: 25:20 The drought of ‘87: 25:30 The unimportance of ‘87: 26:34 Maybe we were right…: 27:22 A relic of the past: 27:40 Godspeed, Bite of ‘87: 28:08