What Liberalism got wrong | John Gray on the failures of the Enlightenment

John Gray and Hilary Lawson discuss liberalism, truth, and the nature of reality. Is moral progress a myth? With a free trial, you can watch John discuss his life and philosophy at https://iai.tv/video/the-life-and-phi... We tend to think philosophy should persuade us toward better, truer world-views. But in this conversation with Hilary Lawson, John Gray argues that the real purpose of philosophy is disruption, not conversion. Lawson shares Gray's skepticism about our ability to access reality directly, but questions how he can therefore justify his own claims. On politics, Gray argues that liberalism has become dogmatic, refusing to acknowledge the political backlash caused by its own policies. However, Lawson points out that the collapse of liberalism would profoundly threaten political stability - something which Gray is eager to preserve. #philosophy #history #enlightenment One of Britain’s most provocative thinkers, John Gray is a political philosopher famous for dismantling liberalism and exposing the illusions of human progress. Former Professor of European Thought at the London School of Economics, Gray has challenged orthodoxy across the political spectrum with a body of work that ranges from critiques of Enlightenment rationalism to meditations on the limits of secular humanism. He is the bestselling author of Straw Dogs, The Silence of Animals, and Seven Types of Atheism as well as a frequent contributor to The Guardian, New Statesman, and The Times Literary Supplement. Gray’s sharp insights and contrarian stance continue to shape contemporary debates on ethics, politics, and the future of humanity. The Institute of Art and Ideas features videos and articles from cutting edge thinkers discussing the ideas that are shaping the world, from metaphysics to string theory, technology to democracy, aesthetics to genetics. Subscribe today! https://iai.tv/subscribe?utm_source=Y... 00:00 Medieval Tibet vs Modern Universities 01:28 How do you manage the apparent tension between your views on the human condition and objectivity? 04:52 Given your criticism of certain strategies of Enlightenment thought, do you not want to call on these strategies in defending your own views? 08:45 Do you think that our theories and language are referring to reality? 11:57 Why do you think that mainstream anglophone philosophy takes such a different view on reality to your own, and is this sustainable? 15:05 What is the alternative to Derrida and Rorty’s approach to philosophy? 17:10 How do you square the anti-establishment yet conservative nature of your beliefs? 19:12 Do you ever feel the tension within your beliefs between a desire for change versus order? 24:22 Does going against liberal humanism run the risk of counteracting your desire for stability and order? For debates and talks: https://iai.tv For articles: https://iai.tv/articles For courses: https://iai.tv/iai-academy/courses