Kodak Ektar 100 Film Stock Review - Why not just buy Portra 160?
What's good! I shot tons of Ektar 100 during my recent trip to the Lake District in the UK and I feel like I have tons to say about the this film stock. Ektar 100 is billed as a professional film photography stock for 35mm and 120 ... but why? Is this film worth buying over the more classic stocks like Portra 160? Most images were made with a Canon 300v and an Agfa Isolette 3, using various lenses. I also included a few shots that weren't taken in the Lake District to show some additional examples of how this film performs in other types of scenes. Chat with me on Instagram: (General) / ribsy__ (Portraits) / ribsy__faces #ektar100#kodak#filmphotography

▶︎
Kodak Ektar - My favourite colour negative film!

▶︎
Kodak Portra 160... The Underrated Pro Film

▶︎
Kodak Ektar 100 vs Portra 160

▶︎
Which film stock should you buy?

▶︎
Ilford HP5 VS Kentmere 400 VS Kodak Tri-X | Black & White film stock comparison

▶︎
This is why EKTAR is the Best!

▶︎
Kodak Ektar 100 C-41 Color Negative Film Review | All About Film

▶︎
Kodak Portra 160 Review, Samples, Tips, Technical Analysis, and Guide | All About Film

▶︎
What's the Deal with Ektar 100?

▶︎
EKTAR 100 vs PORTRA 400 - A Review and Comparison of Two Kodak Color Negative Films

▶︎
Slide Film vs Color Negative: Portra 160, Provia 100F & Velvia 100

▶︎
Is the KODAK Ektar 100 worth the price? | Film stock review

▶︎
Kodak Ektar 100 VS Portra 160 - What's The Difference?

▶︎
Portra 400 & Ektar 100 in Vegas!

▶︎
My LEAST Favorite Film Stock - Ektar 100

▶︎
How Just One Camera Destroyed Kodak Forever

▶︎
A Side by Side Film Test: Portra 400 vs Portra 800

▶︎
Why Your Film Scans Suck

▶︎
The Entire History of Photography, I Guess

▶︎
