Diese Forschungsdaten zeigen, warum deine Beziehung scheitern wird

👉 Free attachment style test: https://simon-eckert.com/bindung-selb... Why do so many relationships fail – even when couples work on their communication? In this video, we look at the most exciting findings in relationship research: from John Gottman's legendary 5:1 rule and the "Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse" to dyadic coping and Sue Johnson's groundbreaking Emotion-Focused Couples Therapy (EFT). We explore the question of whether communication errors are truly the core problem – or whether much deeper mechanisms such as thoughts, emotions, and our attachment style play the decisive role. You'll learn how vulnerable emotions behind anger or withdrawal shape relationships, why stress and personality increase the risk of divorce, and how attachment patterns fundamentally influence our partnerships. If you want to find out your own attachment style and how you can use it to stabilize your relationship, be sure to take the free, scientifically based self-test (link above). References & Further Reading: **Fundamental Work in Relationship Psychology → Summary overview of many of the references mentioned (but without an EFT focus) Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Neyer, F. J. (2017). Psychology of Relationships (2nd, fully revised ed.). Bern: Hogrefe. **Gottman's Relationship Research → 90%+ predictive accuracy of divorce, 5:1 rule, four horsemen of the apocalypse Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Erlbaum. Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(1), 5-22. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predict later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221-233. **Meta-analysis on relationship stability → 115 longitudinal studies, adaptation model of marriage, behaviors as protective/risk factors Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3-34. **Reversal of causal direction → Relationship dissatisfaction leads to poor communication (not vice versa) Lavner, J. A., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2016). Does couples' communication predict relationship satisfaction, or does relationship satisfaction predict communication? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 180-187. **Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) → 70-73% success rate, 86% significant improvements, attachment theory in couples therapy Johnson, S. M. (2019). Attachment Theory in Practice: Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) with Individuals, Couples, and Families. New York: Guilford Press. **Dyadic Coping Bodenmann, G. (1995). Coping with stress in partnerships: The influence of stress on the quality and stability of couple relationships. Huber. Bodenmann, G., & Cina, A. (1999). The influence of stress, individual coping, and dyadic coping on partnership stability: A 4-year longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 130-139. Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28-46. **Genetic influences on divorce risk → Sixfold increase in divorce risk in identical twins McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1992). Genetic influence on risk of divorce. Psychological Science, 3(6), 368-373. **Personality factors in relationships → Neuroticism as a risk factor, agreeableness and conscientiousness as protective factors Heller, D., Watson, D., & Ilies, R. (2004). The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 574-600. Timestamps: 0:00 Gottman's Predictions 1:09 The Surprising Turnaround 3:14 The Mind Trap 4:21 The Breakthrough 6:01 The Vicious Cycle 7:13 Other Factors 9:40 The Solution 11:16 Practical Help