A COMISSÃO SUGERIU SUSPENSÃO E O MINISTRO TE DEMITIU? Entenda a Súmula 672 do STJ!

You are responding to an Administrative Disciplinary Proceeding (PAD), and the commission suggests a light penalty of suspension. However, at the time of the final decision, the judging authority changes the legal framework and decrees your DISMISSAL. Is this legal? The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) has already settled this issue, and the result is a major warning. 💬 Question of the day: Do you think it's fair for the final judge to change the article and apply dismissal, even when the commission that heard the witnesses suggested a lighter penalty? Leave your comment! 🚀 Share this video in groups of public servants, police officers, and military personnel — this strategic information could save a colleague's job. ✅ Subscribe to the channel and activate the bell to receive compelling guidance on Administrative Disciplinary Law and Criminal Execution. 📲 Are you responding to an inquiry or disciplinary proceeding and want to protect your facts before it's too late? Leave your question in the comments or send a direct message so we can analyze your situation in a specialized way. #PublicServant #AdministrativeProcess #PAD #Summary672 #STJ #CesarFreitasLawyer #AdministrativeLaw #Law8112 #HighwayPolice #Dismissal #RightToDefense #MilitaryCareer #PublicJobSecurity