কিয় শ্যামকানুয়ে নিজৰ জামিন নিজেই উঠাই ললে? Who is behind Shyamkanu Mahanta? Zubeen Garg case ll

The bail petitions of Shyamkanu Mahanta and Sandipon Garg were withdrawn by their respective lawyers and the court dismissed the same. Accused Shyamkanu Mahanta, by filing petition No. 291/2026, prayed to withdraw the bail application due to ‘certain developments’ and ‘personal and legal’ reasons. The counsel for accused Sandipon Garg, by filing petition No. 296/2026, also prayed to the court to allow the withdrawal of his client’s bail application. No reason was given for the withdrawal of the bail application of accused Sandipon Garg. The court of the District and Sessions Judge conducted hearings on the bail applications of three accused—Amritprava Mahanta, Paresh Baishya, and Nandeshwar Bora — in the Zubeen Garg case on Thursday and reserved its order, fixing January 30 as the date when the order would be delivered. Special Public Prosecutor (PP) Ziaul Kamar submitted that the prosecution did not have any objection if the bail petitions were allowed to be withdrawn. Following the withdrawal, the court dismissed the bail petitions for accused Shyam Kanu Mahanta and Sandipon Garg. However, the Special PP filed written objections against the bail petitions of the other three accused, namely, Amritprava Mahanta, Nandeswar Borah, and Paresh Baishya. Significantly, Zubeen’s wife, Garima Garg, also filed written objections against the bail petitions of the accused, Amritprava Mahanta, Nandeswar Borah and Paresh Baishya. The court heard arguments from the counsels of both sides on the bail petitions of accused Amritprava Mahanta, Nandeswar Borah and Paresh Baishya but refrained from delivering its order, reserving the same for the next date, fixed as January 30, 2026. During the entire proceedings in court on Thursday, Garima Garg and Zubeen’s sister, Palme Barthakur, were present. #zubeengarg #singapore #case #shyamkanumahanta #assam #india #court #hearing #assamnews