How does Dr Riddle respond to VARIANTS in the TRADITIONAL TEXT?

In this second part, Dr Riddle responds to my questions of variants and uncertainties within the Traditional Text or the Received Text Tradition. What do you do with the variants found among the differing printed TR editions? Dr Riddle then goes on to share some more thoughts on the 'Which TR?' question that often gets brought up against the Confessional Bibliological position. ~~~ RESOURCES ~~~ The Westminster Confession of Faith: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Co... Mark Ward's Critique of Confessional Bibliology: https://www.dropbox.com/s/gdg30j28fvb... Krivda's Response to Mark Ward's article: http://www.jeffriddle.net/2020/10/vin... Jeff Riddle's Channel Word Magazine:    / @wordmagazine   Word Magazine 141 - TBS Statemen of Doctrine of Holy Scripture: http://www.jeffriddle.net/2019/11/wm-... An Exegetical Grounding for a Sacred Standard Text: https://www.amazon.com/Exegetical-Gro... ~~~ CONTENTS ~~~ 0:00 How do you respond to variants or uncertainties in the TR? 0:30 Defining preservation before answering 1:24 Making a clarification about the Received text 3:16 Dr Riddle Answers the question. 5:16 You use Scrivener's text? 6:59 the Which TR objection 8:07 Isn't Confessional Bibliology the same as Textual Criticism? 10:22 The long ending of Mark and the Woman caught in adultery 11:17 CT advocates are no longer looking for the original text 12:41 The general nature of the term "textual criticism" #TextusReceptus #WhichTR #ConfessionalBibliology