Correcting Interpreting Inaccuracies
Corrections and disputes among team interpreters over interpretation should be handled privately and quietly, involving the court only if it is deemed necessary. If a correction is felt necessary, it should be whispered to the active interpreter or written down on a note passed only to that interpreter.
▶︎
Court Interpreting Demonstration
▶︎
USSC Public Meeting- April 16, 2026
▶︎
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 49: Building the Culture you Want
▶︎
Example of Court Interpreter's Interview to Verify Credentials
▶︎
Term Talk Extended (2024-2025): Mahmoud v. Taylor; Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor;
▶︎
OSCAR Training: Managing Recommenders and Recommendations 2026
▶︎
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 51: Leaders’ Role in Workplace Wellbeing
▶︎
USSC Public Hearing - March 9, 2026
▶︎
Consecutive Interpreting Usage
▶︎
Public Data Briefing: 2026 Proposed Amendments Relating to Economic Offenses
▶︎
Federal Judiciary Careers: Court Interpreter
▶︎
Term Talk Extended: Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton; TikTok v. Garland
▶︎
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 50: Beyond Accountability: Rethinking How We Lead
▶︎
USSC Public Hearing - February 17, 2026
▶︎
Mastering OSCAR: How to Create Letters of Recommendation in OSCAR
▶︎
Public Data Briefing: 2026 Proposed Amendment Regarding Human Smuggling Offenses
▶︎
Example of Simultaneous Interpreting
▶︎
Internships Support Diverse Perspectives in Courts
▶︎
USSC Public Meeting - January 30, 2026
▶︎