A Cop Ran Her Plates 228 Times. Flock Cameras Made It Effortless Police searching for women on FLOCK

A police officer ran a woman's license plate 228 times. She never gave him her number. He didn't need it — because Flock cameras and government databases did the work for him.This isn't a one-off. Across the country, officers are using license plate readers, criminal databases, and surveillance tools meant to fight crime to instead stalk, harass, and track women — often for months or years before anyone catches them. In Ottawa, an officer ran a woman's plates repeatedly after a single brief encounter. In Sedgwick, Kansas, a sheriff's deputy used law enforcement databases to track a woman he'd pulled over. In Joplin, Missouri, an officer used police systems to monitor a woman he was interested in. None of these cases were caught by internal audits. They were discovered by the victims themselves or by outside watchdogs. In this video, we break down: • How Flock cameras and license plate readers work — and who has access • The specific cases of officers abusing government databases to stalk women • Why internal oversight almost never catches this behavior • The legal loopholes that make this "technically legal" until someone gets caught • What needs to change to stop police from turning surveillance tools into stalking toolsGovernment databases are supposed to protect the public. When the people with access to those databases use them to prey on the people they're supposed to serve, the system isn't just broken — it's dangerous. Subscribe so you don't miss the next breakdown.#FlockCameras #PoliceSurveillance #LicensePlateReaders #PoliceMisconduct #CivilRights #PrivacyRights #GovernmentDatabases #LawEnforcement #KnowYourRights FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright. NOTE: We don't condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system. NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.