Hukuki El Atma Davalarında Büyük Hata! Maktu Vekâlet Ücreti Uygulaması

In this video, I've addressed the long-debated issue of fixed attorney fees in cases of expropriation without compensation and legal seizure of property, covering all aspects. In particular, the recent decisions of some courts and the Supreme Court of Appeals, which award fixed attorney fees instead of proportional attorney fees in favor of the plaintiff in legal seizure cases, are causing serious losses of rights. But is this truly the intention of the legislator? What changes were made in the Turkish Grand National Assembly during the drafting of Law No. 7421? Why was the "fixed attorney fee" provision removed from the draft law? Are courts making decisions based on a draft law that hasn't been enacted? What do the Constitutional Court decisions and the minutes of the Turkish Grand National Assembly say about this? In this video: ✅ I thoroughly examine the legal basis of expropriation lawsuits, ✅ the distinction between proportional and fixed attorney fees, ✅ critical details in the Turkish Grand National Assembly minutes, ✅ errors in application by local courts, ✅ contradictions in Supreme Court rulings, ✅ and the resulting loss of rights for lawyers and citizens. This video is an important assessment for lawyers working in the fields of real estate law, expropriation lawsuits, and administrative law, as well as for law students and rights holders. Don't forget to like the video, leave a comment, and subscribe to the channel. #expropriationwithoutcompensation #legalseizure #attorneyfees #SupremeCourt #expropriation #realestatelaw #administrativelaw #law #attorney #relativeattorneyfees --- Web: https://muratezcan.av.tr Twitter:   / muratezcan   Instagram:   / avmuratezcan   Youtube:    / avmurattezcan   Facebook:   / murat.tezcan.7   Linkedin:   / muratezcan