"Ya se fueron a ver el futbol": Noroña “destroza” al PRI por dar la espalda a migrantes

The PRI found itself at the center of controversy during the Permanent Commission session: it did not endorse a statement from the Legislative Branch in defense of Mexican migrants living and working in the United States. Furthermore, Gerardo Fernández Noroña harshly criticized the legislators who left their seats, claiming that several had gone to watch a soccer game. Laura Itzel Castillo reported that the document was supported by all parliamentary groups represented on the Board of Directors, with the exception of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). This stance provoked strong criticism from legislators of the National Regeneration Movement (Morena) and the Labor Party (PT), who questioned why the PRI did not support an issue related to the protection of Mexican nationals. Carolina Viggiano and Manuel Añorve responded that the PRI has historically defended the migrant cause and rejected the ruling party's attempt to portray them as a party opposed to Mexicans in the United States. However, Simey Olvera, Reginaldo Sandoval, Geovanna Bañuelos, and Beatriz Navarro questioned the absence of legislators from the PRI, PAN, and Movimiento Ciudadano parties during the debate. Did the PRI have political reasons for not signing, or were they exposed by withdrawing from the statement? Is it acceptable to leave a session while the defense of Mexican migrants is being discussed? Leave your opinion in the comments, share this video, and subscribe to SignoMx to follow the most important news, debates, and confrontations in the Senate, the Chamber of Deputies, and Mexican politics. #SignoMx #Noroña #PRI #MexicanMigrants #Senate #CarolinaViggiano #Morena #MexicanPolitics