A eucaristia como sacrifício a ser comido (Resposta a Matheus Fugita)

In this video, I address the issue of the Eucharist prefigured in the Old Testament as a sacrifice to be eaten. I offer a commentary on a video by Matheus Fugita about an argument by Ariel Lazari based on Leviticus 10. In the video, Matthew quotes the text of Leviticus 6:30: "But no sin offering whose blood is brought into the tent of meeting to make atonement in the sanctuary shall be eaten; it shall be burned with fire." But verse 29 says: "Every male among the priests may eat it; it is most holy." Thus, Ariel Lazari's argument remains valid: some sacrifices of the Old Covenant were eaten... therefore, in the New Covenant, the Sacrifice of Jesus must also be eaten! This is accomplished through the Lord's Supper.