Judge SHUTS DOWN Probation Plea — "83 Police Reports?!” NO MERCY GIVEN

#Courtroom #CourtTV #Judge #Justice #Sentencing #CrimeNews #truecrimecommunity This courtroom session featured several felony cases involving sentencing, probation decisions, and plea agreements. The most significant hearing involved Justin Living, who pleaded guilty to credit/debit card abuse and burglary of a habitation under a plea agreement with a maximum sentence of 10 years. His defense requested probation, arguing that many prior felony charges had been dismissed and that he had strong family support. However, prosecutors highlighted his extensive criminal history, including 83 police reports, repeated offenses dating back to 2001, and allegations that victims were often too fearful to pursue charges. The judge strongly rejected the probation request, stating that Living's lengthy criminal record and repeated violent behavior demonstrated that he posed an ongoing risk to the community. The court sentenced him to 10 years in prison for each offense, with both sentences to run concurrently, while dismissing a related protective order violation as part of the plea agreement. Another case involved Alejandro Yuribe, who pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Although immigration issues and a federal hold complicated the case, the judge honored the plea agreement by granting five years of deferred adjudication probation, warning that any future violations could result in a prison sentence of up to 20 years. The court also sentenced Demetrius Miles to 10 years in prison after he pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, including an affirmative deadly weapon finding. Finally, Gabrielle Smith's robbery case was reviewed, with the judge expressing serious concern over her extensive criminal history before considering the appropriate sentence. Subscribe My Channel-[‪@GAVELTIME-c2t‬ ] Disclaimer: This summary is based on publicly available courtroom proceedings and is intended solely for news reporting, education, and commentary. It does not constitute legal advice, and all individuals are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. Viewers should refer to official court records for complete and accurate case information.