أمريكا تضرب إيران انتقامًا لمقتل جنودها

🔥 Follow Dr. Omar Abdel Sattar's exclusive analyses: • Watch the previous episode:    • دون حكومة وطنية جديدة في ايران لا يوجد است...   • Find all of Dr. Omar's analyses here:    • عدسات سياسة   🔔 • Don't forget to subscribe to the channel and activate the bell to receive the latest analyses from Dr. Omar Abdel Sattar. 🌐 Social Media: ➤   / omarabdulsatar   ➤   / omar.abdulsattar1   📰 • America Strikes Iran in Retaliation for the Killing of Its Soldiers • Indications are growing that a direct confrontation between Israel and Iran could resume, amidst complex calculations involving intertwined military and political interests. Estimates suggest that the absence of a green light from the US and Iran's failure to launch a new attack are the two main reasons preventing a new confrontation so far. Meanwhile, Israel continues to raise its military readiness level, with senior officials asserting that any Iranian attack will be met with a broad and harsh response, while also hinting at "surprises" that could change the rules of engagement. Conversely, intelligence assessments indicate that Tehran is not currently seeking a direct confrontation but is awaiting any development that might justify action. The continued US military presence, including the deployment of refueling aircraft at Israeli bases, reflects ongoing support and preparedness for any potential escalation. There are also concerns that Israel might exploit any attacks carried out by Iranian-backed groups, such as the Houthis or Hezbollah, as a pretext to expand military operations and reopen the conflict. Meanwhile, debate is intensifying regarding the nature of the US response to the attacks on its forces, with calls for a decisive response that would impose a heavy cost on any future attacks and limit Iran's ability to threaten international shipping, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz. In light of the recent attacks across the Gulf and Jordan, Tehran appears to be relying on its remaining regional leverage. However, this strategy could backfire by expanding anti-Iranian alliances, eroding its regional influence, and drawing it into a broader confrontation with the international community, including some of its partners. While Iran possesses the capacity to escalate tensions, the crucial question remains whether it can control the repercussions, given a regional and international environment that has become more reactive and more sensitive to any threat to the security of the Middle East and vital maritime routes. 📰 • US Strikes Iran in Retaliation for the Killing of Its Soldiers • There are growing indications that a direct confrontation between Israel and Iran could resume, amid complex calculations shaped by overlapping military and political interests. Current assessments suggest that the absence of a U.S. Green light, combined with Iran's decision not to launch another attack, are the two main factors preventing a renewed confrontation for now. Meanwhile, Israel continues to raise its level of military readiness, with senior officials emphasizing that any Iranian attack would be met with a broad and severe response. They also have spoken of "surprises" that could change the rules of engagement. On the other side, intelligence assessments indicate that Tehran is not currently seeking a direct confrontation. However, it is closely watching for any development that could provide a justification for taking action. At the same time, the continued U.S. Military presence, including the deployment of aerial refueling aircraft at Israeli bases, reflects ongoing American support and preparedness for any potential escalation. There are also concerns that Israel could use attacks carried out by Iranian-aligned groups, such as the Houthis or Hezbollah, as a pretext to expand its military operations and reopen the conflict on a broader front. At the same time, debate is intensifying over the nature of the U.S. respond following attacks on its forces. Some are calling for a decisive response that would impose a heavy cost on any future attacks and reduce Iran's ability to threaten international shipping, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz. Against the backdrop of the recent attacks across the Gulf and Jordan, Tehran appears to be relying on its remaining regional leverage. However, this strategy could prove counterproductive by strengthening coalitions opposed to Iran, draining its regional influence, and drawing it into a broader confrontation with the international community, including some of its own partners. Although Iran retains the ability to escalate tensions, the more important question is whether it can control the consequences of doing so in a regional and international environment that has become increasingly prepared to respond and more sensitive to any threat to the security of the Middle East and ...