Demoralisation in Real Time: How 12 Angry Men (1957) tricks you into feeling good about bad choices
Sidney Lumet's 12 Angry Men (1957) is a well loved, highly regarded film. It's praised for its compassion and intelligence, as it uses argument and deduction to decide a controversial court case. However, on even brief examination, this film is dishonest and its arguments are fallacious. I cover the bad arguments used by Juror 8 and how they lead to a bad conclusion. 12 Angry Men can be called clever, but devious might be more appropriate. Apologies for the weird frame rate on my commentary - I adjusted some settings when filming and missed the fps drop.

▶︎
15 Weirdest Facts About 12 Angry Men (1957) You Never Knew

▶︎
How 12 ANGRY MEN breaks screenwriting rules

▶︎
Every Juror in 12 Angry men ranked

▶︎
*12 Angry Men* is sooo good!

▶︎
What RAF Pilots Said When They First Flew The American P-51 Mustang

▶︎
Northernlion talks 12 Angry Men

▶︎
12 Angry Men - Movie Review

▶︎
12 Angry Men (1957) vs 12 Angry Men (1997) - Who Did It Better?

▶︎
The Scariest Movie Ever Made...

▶︎
12 Angry Men - The Value of Human Life

▶︎
Propaganda & Persuasion in 12 Angry Men (1957)

▶︎
15 Forgotten 80s Sci‑Fi Movies That Still Hold Up in 2026

▶︎
The Cocaine Years: SNL's Darkest Era

▶︎
12 Angry Men (1957) | First Time Reaction

▶︎
12 Angry Men Deep Dive: The Hero Who Broke | What True Courage Looks Like #12angrymen #herosjourney

▶︎
The Zen Acting of The Big Lebowski | Acting Breakdown

▶︎
Decided by Scientists: 9 Most Realistic PSYCHOPATHS in Cinema History

▶︎
How To Change One's Mind {Episode 01}

▶︎
