Who decides which forms of resistance are legitimate?

History is full of resistance movements that were condemned in their time but later celebrated, including the French Resistance, women’s suffrage and the fight against apartheid led by Nelson Mandela. This begs the question: Which modern resistance movements will the world honor in the future, and what determines whether or not they are recognized? In this episode, we explore the question of what makes resistance legitimate. Is it the cause, the tactics, the outcome—or something else? And who gets to decide whether or not legitimacy is granted? 💬 Join the conversation in the comments. Featuring: Diana Buttu: Practitioner-in-residence, Georgetown University in Qatar Victor Gao: Vice president, Center for China and Globalization Saeed Khan: Associate professor of Near East & Asian studies, Wayne State University Amina Rasul: President, Philippine Center for Islam and Democracy Moderated by presenter, filmmaker and producer ‪@BENIxNadir‬. ⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰ 2:09 How do we decide what type of resistance is legitimate? 3:27 “Resistance does not exist in a vacuum. It exists in a context.” 7:31 Can context justify resistance? 11:28 Dimensions of resistance: Act vs. tactic 19:42 Absolute vs. relative justification 20:01 Self-determination and resistance: The Palestine exception 50:12 Can faith determine whether resistance is justifiable? 1:14:43 The mythology of resistance 1:43:29 Do corporations have more power than states? 1:49:28 “If there is injustice, there will be resistance.” 1:50:45 “What we really need is more women at the table.” 1:56:23 What makes a resistance group successful? 1:59:39 Experts answer: What resistance movement inspired or impacted you? ►► Subscribe & join the conversation: http://bit.ly/38fuJjZ Don’t Settle for a Divided World. Think. Debate. Act. Let’s find solutions to the world's most pressing problems. Doha Debates engages a vanguard of intellectually curious truth-seekers to constructively debate differences in order to build a better future. We emphasize unity over division, encouraging conversations that bring us together rather than drive us apart. Learn more: dohadebates.com