DE CE RUDELE VICTIMELOR CRED CĂ ȘOFERUL AR PUTEA SCĂPA FĂRĂ PEDEAPSĂ?

A car, driven by the head of the Ungheni Prosecutor's Office, hit a cart carrying six people. As a result of the impact, four people, including a 3-month-old child, died, and two others, a 3-year-old girl and her grandfather, were taken to the hospital in serious condition. Following the impact, law enforcement officers handcuffed the state prosecutor. Magistrates placed him in pretrial detention for 30 days. However, the victims' relatives are dissatisfied, because the Superior Council of Prosecutors decided that the driver of the car should keep his seat in the Ungheni prosecutor's office. What versions do the victims' relatives, as well as the driver of the car, have about the accident? What position did the prosecutor take in this case? What displeases the victims' relatives and why do they believe that the driver of the car could escape without punishment? What conflict arose between the two parties after the accident? How it was possible for the prosecutor to keep his position, but also why his defenders say that the preventive arrest measure was taken unjustly, we will find out in this report.