QBRICK TWO vs. Hanskonner HANSTORAGE PLUS. Системы Хранения. Ящик на диване №15

First impressions and comparisons of storage systems. Qbric TWO vs. Hanskonner HANSTORAGE PLUS. Storage Systems. Box on the sofa #15 HSP5KIT Set of boxes of the HANSTORAGE PLUS storage system (5 pcs) on wheels QBRICK SYSTEM TWO 6 in 1 Description and time codes: 00:00 Introduction and announcement • Greetings and introduction of the channel. • Announcement of unpacking the box from Kubrick. • Mention of plans to test batteries. 01:06 Robot vacuum cleaner • Demonstration of a battery-powered robot vacuum cleaner. • Description of its functions: battery operation, rechargeability, filter and cooler. • Comparison with Chinese analogues. 03:20 Light sensor • Introduction of a light sensor with Bluetooth. • Explanation of the device operation via phone. 04:19 Unpacking the Kubrick box • Start of unpacking the Kubrick box. • Comparison of dimensions with other models. • Discussion of quality and cost. 05:45 Features of the Kubrick box • Description of the side fasteners and handle. • Number of items in the set. • Comparison with other storage systems. 08:37 Comparison with Han Connor • Detailed comparison of dimensions and locks. • Advantages of metal locks over plastic ones. • Quality of plastic and additional fasteners. 10:35 Conclusion • Summarizing the results of the comparison. • Mention of additional fasteners and a handle. • Promise of a separate video with tests. 12:12 Comparison of storage systems • Discussion of storage systems from different manufacturers, including Kubrick and Milka. • Mention of problems with the wheels of the Hen Connor when climbing stairs. • Comparison of the usability of systems. 13:11 Features of wheels and handles • Description of rubberized wheels and their diameter. • Comparison of handles and their cuts. • Note on the possible removal of the protruding part. 14:07 Installing drawers • Explanation of the process of installing drawers in one touch. • Discussion of the usability for rare trips. • Problems with daily use. 15:18 Organizers and dividers • Description of the organizers and dividers in the set. • The ability to install organizers in different places. • Thoughtfulness of the storage system for 11 thousand rubles. 17:12 Additional elements • Review of a small drawer and tray. • Features of fixing the organizers. • Ease of use of the organizers. 19:22 Quality of plastic and locks • Comparison of the quality of plastic from different manufacturers. • Metal locks on organizers. • Testing the quality of plastic. 20:15 Versatility and convenience • Ability to mix elements for convenience. • Thoughtfulness of the lid and interior space. • Limitations in the placement of elements. 22:27 Cost and further tests • Cost of the storage system: 20 thousand rubles without promotions. • Plans for testing hinges and drawer thickness. • Comparison of the quality of plastic from different systems. 24:00 Conclusion • Call for viewers to leave comments about the video. • Explanation of why the author films the unpacking on camera. • Emphasizing the speed of creating the video compared to tests. 24:24 Review of the system with dividers • The system includes drawers with dividers that can be divided into four parts. • The system costs 15 thousand rubles without organizers, and 11 thousand rubles with organizers. • The author explains that he answers viewers' questions in detail. 25:22 Ease of use • The system handle has a lock, but may be inconvenient for tall people. • The height of the system is suitable for a height of 190 cm, but there are some minor drawbacks. • The size of the wheels is larger than that of some other systems. 26:45 Comparison with other systems • The system handle is lower than that of Milwaukee, which may be inconvenient for tall people. • The system is made of a profile that can be extended. • The author compares it with the Milwaukee system, which costs from 40 to 60 thousand rubles. 27:46 Capacity and quality • The system for 10 thousand rubles has a smaller volume and worse plastic compared to Milwaukee. • The Milwaukee system has more drawers and organizers. • The ribs on the boxes can provide strength, but this will be verified in tests. 30:09 Purpose of the system • The system is designed for transportation, not for home use. • For professional use, it is better to choose more reliable systems. 31:07 Comparison with the DeWalt system • The DeWalt system is smaller and less reliable compared to Milwaukee. • DeWalt locks are softer and bend easier. • DeWalt offers a more reliable Touch system for 36 thousand rubles, but Milwaukee offers more options. 33:45 Conclusion • The DeWalt system competes with boxes such as Fistul Seiner and HD Boxes. • In terms of plastic thickness, the DeWalt system is more interesting, but in terms of convenience, Milwaukee is preferable. • The author says goodbye to the viewers and promises new meetings.