Päivi Räsäsen Ensimmäinen Haastattelu Tuomion Jälkeen

In a special episode of the Kuuntelija podcast, the guest is Member of Parliament Päivi Räsänen, who received a conviction from the Supreme Court on Thursday for incitement against a group of people. With Päivi, we discussed the absurdity of the court’s decision, how she is feeling right now, what the future of freedom of speech looks like, trusting in God, whether Päivi plans to appeal the decision to the European Court of Human Rights, and much more that is interesting and relevant to the case. This is Päivi’s first interview after Thursday’s court ruling. The episode was recorded on Friday 27.3. We definitely did not stay inside the Overton window. TIMESTAMPS 00:00 Start 00:27 Feelings after the decision 06:30 The verdict 12:55 Concern for the future 18:36 Pamphlet 29:57 Problem with the law 37:02 Faith & God 45:30 Justice system 51:06 Costs 55:32 Message to those celebrating 56:29 Reputation damage 1:04:09 Appealing the decision 1:08:48 Freedom of speech 1:26:34 Discussion in Finland 1:29:44 The Bible 1:33:40 Greetings to the judges Switch from harmful Gmail to ProtonMail that respects your privacy (Kuuntelija podcast affiliate link): https://pr.tn/ref/KXX3JEDA Guest’s social media 𝕏 https://x.com/PaiviRasanen   / paivirasanenkd     / p_rasanen   Support on Patreon   / roniarvonen   Social media    / @kuuntelijapodcast     / roniarvonen     / roniarvonen     / roniarvonen     / roni.arvonen   𝕏 https://x.com/RoniArvonen Kuuntelija podcast theme music: © Elias Sinervo, composer-guitarist ---- This episode discusses statistical differences, cultural characteristics, or behavioral patterns among various ethnic, demographic, or population groups. At no point is it implied that an entire group, or all of its members, are the same in any way or collectively responsible for anything. We emphasize that all people possess equal human dignity regardless of their background. Human dignity is indivisible. Every group contains both good and bad individuals, and the actions of any person never justify assigning collective guilt to an entire group. Any criticism is directed solely at specific phenomena, statistics, practices, or ideologies—not at people on the basis of their ethnicity or any other group identity.