The San Francisco Patrol Special Police Officers
Do some wealthier San Francisco neighborhoods, select businesses and citizens ever get more SFPD police protection than the poor? Did the City destroy a community police force of once hundreds of local neighborhood Patrol Special Police officers while trying to increase revenues by hiring out the SFPD as private security? Did the City take the retirements of elderly and disabled Patrol Special Police Officers? Do City officials have a position on whether the disappearance of neighborhood Patrol Special Police Officers from the streets has affected the high crime rate? Why is every San Francisco public official silent on this matter? Sadly, after Patrol Specials were there for the City through earthquakes, police strikes, depressions and crime, as an essential part of peace and security since 1851, now they are all but gone. All of this, according to allegations in their lawsuit, in which the Patrol Specials believe they are fighting for the rights to be able to protect the public and remain on the streets. The City Attorney's Office is still fighting the Patrol Specials in court to destroy the Patrol Specials' rights, and refusing to negotiate, despite the Patrol Specials offering solutions they believe to be in the public interest, including crime reduction and cost reduction for the City. It is unclear under whose authority and direction these City decisions are being made today. While the California Superior Court ruled that the Patrols Specials have a valid case and constitutionally-protected property rights, which Patrol Specials claim has historically ensured they can be paid by the communities they serve and which kept them on the street, the City Attorney's office removed the case to a federal court which reversed that decision and threw out the entire case without trial. The case is now headed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The last of these heroes believe they are fighting for the safety of the city, and if the City continues to refuse to negotiate, will take this case to the Supreme Court of the United States, if necessary. They are represented by their sole attorney, Daniel A. Bakondi, Esq. , United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-16311, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 3:16-cv-00691 WHA. (Formerly San Francisco Superior Court Case No.CGC13-528788) The movie above shows the Patrol Specials and their claims as of April 2017, prior to the federal court's ruling. For more information, please visit http://www.gofundme.com/patrolspecial... or contact their attorney, Daniel A. Bakondi, Esq.. http://www.danielbakondi.com See our updated video at • Patrol Special Police San Francisco Litiga...

Defense Attorney Catches Cop Inventing a Traffic Law in Court

Corrupt Cops Arrest Man For Looking in His OWN Car I $5M LAWSUIT

We Asked a CIA Officer 24 Tough Questions | Honesty Box

Private Police: System failure or solution?

Ride along with the last of the San Francisco Patrol Special police

Inside America’s Most Notorious Death Row Facility

Ep #545 LEOSA: Can "Special Police" Carry Under LEOSA?

Corrupt Kentucky sheriff brought down by reporters

People Are Hiring Private Police Squads in Detroit

San Francisco Police Academy Class 283

City Police vs County Sheriff: Redundant? Rivals?

What it's like to train with the U.S. Secret Service's elite Counter Assault Team

SFPD - Officer Nathan Rapolla

Private security cars branded with 'police' raise questions for some, provide peace of mind for

This School District In Texas May Create Its Own Police Force (HBO)

American Dystopia, Part 3: San Francisco residents turn to private police

Day in the Life - Police Officer

"What to Do About Crime" by Leonard Peikoff

Why I Don't EDC Handcuffs Off Duty

