Canon 100-300 vs 400 f/2.8 - Con cuál me quedo?

Can a zoom like the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 replace a beast like the RF 400mm f/2.8 in nature photography? In this video, I share my real-life experience using the 100-300 for a week in Andújar. We talk about weight, versatility, and something few people mention: how the way of working with a zoom changes compared to a prime lens. This analysis is from the perspective of a wildlife photographer working in the field, not from a spec sheet. If you're interested in real-life nature photography, subscribe and activate the bell. Which would you use in the field? Is the versatility of the zoom more rewarding or the brutal blur of the 400mm f/2.8? I'll read you in the comments! By the way, if you want to come with me to take photos, here are the activities I have planned: https://marcalbiacphotography.com/via...