🔔RÉU METEU O LOUCO E JUIZ PAULO AFONSO E ADVOGADO PERDEM A PACIÊNCIA

🙏 Help us with a Pix donation of any amount ✨ 🏦 PIX (CNPJ): 04.436.297/0001-93 💛 Any contribution makes a difference! 📄 SUMMARY OF THE SENTENCE – DRUG TRAFFICKING 📌 Case Number: 0706846-17.2023.8.07.0001 📍 Court: 1st Narcotics Court of the Federal District – TJDFT 👤 Defendant: Lucas Rodrigues da Silva ⚖️ Imputed Criminal Offense: Article 33, caput, of Law 11.343/2006 (drug trafficking) 🗓️ Fact: Arrest in flagrante delicto on 02/14/2023 👩‍⚖️ Judge: Verônica Capocio 🧾 CASE SUMMARY The Public Prosecutor's Office charged the defendant with drug trafficking after the seizure of cocaine at a location that functioned as a bar and a Car wash. The prosecution was based on anonymous tips, police testimonies, and statements given during the investigative phase by people present at the scene. The defense argued for the invalidity of the personal search and, on the merits, the absence of evidence of authorship, maintaining that the location was publicly accessible and that the drug was not found in the defendant's direct possession. 🔍 JUSTIFICATION OF THE SENTENCE Personal search: considered lawful, as there were anonymous tips accompanied by suspicious behavior observed at the location (well-founded reasons). Materiality: proven by expert reports (cocaine). Authorship: not proven securely. The direct accusations against the defendant came only from the investigative phase, without confirmation in court. Key witnesses (especially the car wash tenant and the defendant's partner) did not confirm authorship in court. The location had open access to the public, and the defendant was not caught in a typical act of drug trafficking, nor with drugs or paraphernalia in direct possession. Application of article 155 of the CPP: exclusively inquisitorial evidence is insufficient for conviction. Application of the principle in dubio pro reo. 🏛️ DECISION Acquittal of the defendant Lucas Rodrigues da Silva, based on article 386, V, of the CPP (insufficient evidence regarding authorship). Seized goods: Drugs: incineration (article 72 of Law 11.343/06). Precision scales: destruction. Money, external hard drive and cell phone: restitution to the accused. Costs: none. 🏷️ Tags: #DrugTrafficking, #Acquittal, #InDubioProReo, #InquisitorialEvidence, #TJDFT, #DrugLaw, #Sentence