OB Paper Review: ARRIVE Trial
Grobman et al., (2018): https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056... The ARRIVE trial was a large randomized controlled trial that enrolled over 6,000 low-risk nulliparous women at 41 hospitals in the United States and international sites. The women were randomly assigned to either elective induction of labor at 39 weeks' gestation or expectant management (waiting for spontaneous labor). The trial excluded women with certain medical or obstetrical complications, such as gestational diabetes or preeclampsia. The primary outcome of the trial was a composite of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including: Maternal: cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis (infection of the fetal membranes), endometritis (infection of the uterus lining), and postpartum hemorrhage (excessive bleeding after delivery). Neonatal: a composite of perinatal death, Apgar score of 3 or less at 5 minutes, neonatal resuscitation, seizure, meconium aspiration syndrome (breathing problems caused by inhaling fecal matter), and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (brain damage caused by lack of oxygen). The trial found that the rate of the primary outcome was not significantly different between the two groups: 18.6% in the elective induction group and 22.2% in the expectant management group. Specifically, there was no significant difference in the rates of cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, perinatal death, or Apgar score of 3 or less at 5 minutes. However, the rate of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was significantly lower in the elective induction group compared to the expectant management group (4.4% vs. 5.4%). The trial authors concluded that elective induction of labor at 39 weeks' gestation in low-risk nulliparous women did not increase the risk of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes, compared to expectant management. However, they noted that the decision of whether to induce labor should still be based on individual patient factors and preferences, and that additional studies are needed to evaluate the optimal timing of elective induction of labor. Overall, the ARRIVE trial provides important evidence to help inform the management of labor in low-risk nulliparous women, and its results have implications for clinical practice and healthcare policy. Main paper that assessed labor inductions with spontaneous labor. cesarean sections and hypertensive disorders were reduced in the induction group. Additionally, their primary outcome was perinatal outcomes which was not different between the two groups.

OB Paper Review: C/SOAP Trial

A "Risk Reducing" 39 Week Induction: the ARRIVE Trial & busy OB practice

Labor induction vs expectant management in low risk nulliparous women

ARRIVE Trial Deep Dive 👀 39 Week Induction

England – Argentinien Highlights | Halbfinale, FIFA WM 2026 | sportstudio

Watch his reaction when he’s told he’s a GOOD BOY for the first time 🥹

Labor Induction, Pitocin, and the ARRIVE Trial discussed | The Dr. Lexi Show

Colin Farrell Opens Up About His Son With Angelman Syndrome | PEOPLE

Service Dog Owner Training: How to train a service dog using positive reinforcement

Is Induced Labor at 39 Weeks Best for Mom and Baby?

Cait: Living With Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)

I've never tried zucchini like this before! Now I cook this zucchini five times a week!

OB Paper Review: ALPS trial.

Signs of Low Progesterone and What You Can Do About It | Is Your Progesterone Low?

A doctor who left Rochester to practice in Canada reflects on the decision 10 years later

ARRIVE study

The Nursing Crisis Is About To Get Much Worse (Here's What's Coming in 2026)

I'm an OB/GYN Going Through Miscarriage -- Here Are Your Treatment Options

Nervous System Regulation (999 Hz) | 1 hour handpan music | Malte Marten

What to Expect for a Scheduled C-Section | Labour & Delivery Nurse Explains

SHOULD I GET AN INDUCTION | Only Get LABOR INDUCED After Answering These Questions

