एकतरफा Citizenship Cancel Order पर बड़ा फैसला | Supreme Court Demands Fair Citizenship Process

Major Decision on Unilateral Citizenship Cancellation Order | Supreme Court Demands Fair Citizenship Process, Citizenship Hearings #supremecourt #citizenship #constitution #law #india Declared Foreigners Without Fair Hearing? | SC Orders Fresh Hearing in 27 Cases Constitution Course: https://academy.doonlawmentor.com/new... Citizenship and Election Law Course: https://courses.judicialyogi.com/new-... The Supreme Court has set aside orders declaring 27 appellants as foreigners in cases related to Assam's citizenship proceedings. According to Supreme Court news, the process followed against the 27 people who were declared non-citizens or infiltrators has been deemed unfair. This video is for those who want to take a deeper look at the country's new legal orders and court verdicts. 00:00 – Supreme Court questions foreigner order 01:10 – Foreigners Tribunal ex-parte order explained 04:57 – Remanding case for fresh adjudication 08:35 – Foreigners Act Section 9 burden proof 11:09 – Procedural fairness and citizenship rights 15:15 – Supreme Court ruling on citizenship status 19:26 – Key takeaways from landmark judgment In this video, we will discuss how this court verdict was changed due to unfair process. All important aspects of the non-citizens decision have been explained in simple language to provide complete information. This update on the Infiltrator case demonstrates the impartiality of the legal system. Subscribe to the channel for legal updates and court decisions. Do you think this decision is correct? Do share your opinion in the comments section. In the case of Sabitri Dey @ Swasthi Dey v. Union of India, the bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta said that the determination of citizenship and foreigner status should be done through a process that is fair, lawful and reasonable. The Court set aside the judgments of the Gauhati High Court and the corresponding opinions of the concerned Foreigners Tribunals and sent all the cases back to the Tribunals for fresh adjudication. But the most important clarification of the judgment is this: The Supreme Court has not declared 27 appellants as Indian citizens. Impact on Citizenship of Deleted VotersThe Court did not give any final opinion on the genuineness, admissibility, relevance or sufficiency of their documents. All these questions will now have to be decided independently by the concerned Foreigners Tribunals. Paid Courses: https://academy.doonlawmentor.com/new... Test Series: https://academy.doonlawmentor.com/tes... 📱 Download Doon Law Mentor App: Android: doonlawmentor.com/android iOS: doonlawmentor.com/ios📱 Top Playlist: 1)    • Labour Laws in India | Industrial Disputes...   2)    • नागरिकता ,चुनावी कानून और चुनाव सुधार | |C...   3)    • Latest Legal Updates | नवीनतम कानूनी अपडेट्स   4)    • Technology and New-Age Laws | Cyber Law, A...   5)    • Property Laws | Law of Property in India |...   6)    • कानून और धर्म | Law and Religion   7)    • भारतीय संविधान के ऐतिहासिक निर्णय | Consti...   8)    • Advocacy and Judiciary | Bar & Bench | Adv...   9)    • Top 100 Legal Legends of India | Judicial ...   10)    • राष्ट्रपति संदर्भ मामले | Presidential Ref...   📱 Download Doon Law Mentor App: Android: doonlawmentor.com/android iOS: doonlawmentor.com/ios Both: doonlawmentor.com/app 📱Judicial Yogi App (Google Play): https://tinyurl.com/JudicialYogi 📌Connect With us @ Doon Law Mentor – Your Path to Judiciary Success 🌐 Website: https://doonlawmentor.com 💬 WhatsApp Channel: https://tinyurl.com/DLMwhatsappChannel 📲 Telegram: https://t.me/doonlawmentor 📸 Instagram:   / doonlawmentor   📘 Facebook:   / doonlawmentor   ✉ Sponsorship and Business Email: [email protected]