БИОПАНК VS КИБЕРПАНК

Support the author - https://yoomoney.ru/to/4100110582332003 Read my books - https://author.today/u/elisp My VK group - https://vk.com/sergei_elis_avtor Book "punks" have long been a fixture in modern literature. Their vast number literally teems with all kinds of science: nanopunk, biopunk, cyberpunk, atompunk, steampunk, aeropunk, greenpunk, and a dozen other different genres. But does this change the essence? After all, the essence of the genre was initially the opposition between society and technology. The gap between the two vectors of development became so strong that it distorted the lives of ordinary people. So does the prefix "-punk" make a difference? Or does the true depth of the genre lie in its philosophical and social concept? I'll conduct an experiment and try to understand, using the well-known cyberpunk and the slightly less hyped biopunk as examples, what's true and what's simulacra. LET'S GO! BIOPUNK VS. CYBERPUNK! "RAVE ON THE RINGS OF SATURN" Read here ➢ https://author.today/work/92329 Useful links: Group https://vk.com/sergei_elis_avtor Instagram   / writer_sergey_elis   Email [email protected] Read https://author.today/u/elisp You can download the author's books (meaning mine) for free at this link. https://vk.com/docs-26940900 Buy here https://vk.com/market-26940900 #BIOPUNK #CYBERPUNK #BIOPUNK