Amin & @GodLogicApologetics INVADE and BAKE Muslim Panel! 🤣

In this debate, the discussion starts with Qur’an 2:79 and the claim that the Bible is corrupted—but something important happens mid-conversation. Instead of staying on the actual argument, the Muslim side shifts the discussion toward a different issue: the authenticity of the Bible. This is a classic move—because if the original point fails, the conversation gets redirected. But here’s the key moment: 👉 The claim was that Qur’an 2:79 proves textual corruption of the Torah 👉 When pressed, it couldn’t be shown from the verse itself 👉 The argument then shifted away from the text to external sources and assumptions As the discussion continues, a crucial distinction is exposed: Writing a different book and claiming it’s from God ≠ corrupting the original text This becomes the turning point of the debate. 0:00 – Opening: Qur’an 2:79 & Corruption Claim 1:20 – Key Question: All or Some Corruption? 3:10 – What Does “Writing with Their Hands” Mean? 5:00 – The Core Analogy (Qur’an Comparison) 7:00 – Debate Turns: Appeal to Tafsir vs Text 9:30 – Attempted Topic Shift (Strawman Begins) 12:00 – Pressing the Verse Itself 14:00 – Major Concession Moment 17:30 – Foundation Argument Collapses 20:30 – Burden of Proof Breakdown 24:30 – Cannot Prove from the Verse 27:30 – Contradiction Exposed 30:30 – “You Just Corrupted the Qur’an?” Moment 33:30 – Symmetry Argument Fails 38:30 – Islamic Dilemma Introduced 42:00 – Grammar & Tense Debate 46:30 – Final Push & Collapse 47:30 – Conclusion: No Proof of Corruption #fyp #christian #jesus #islam #muhammad