Das seltsame Fundament moderner Physik

The following text provides a short overview of the critique regarding Einstein's theories of light compared to Newton's classical approach, as presented in the sources. The "ball experiment" is central to this critique, demonstrating that light behaves predictably—like a ball bouncing off walls—despite the Earth's high orbital and rotational speeds . This observation directly challenges "modernist theories," which are based on Albert Einstein's description of light speed as something "strange, baffling, and mysterious" . The sources argue that Einstein did not actually solve the mystery of light speed but instead used this unexplained phenomenon as a foundation for his broader theories . Critics within the sources find it problematic that "world physics" is built upon a phenomenon that its own architects described as "not solved" . They compare this approach to a "schizophrenic" way of thinking, where complex systems are constructed on a single, poorly understood idea . In contrast, Newton’s ether hypothesis is viewed more favorably as a logical, mechanical explanation . By comparing the ether to a modern mobile network that allows data to spread, the sources suggest that Newton offered a "near-at-hand" explanation for how light moves through space . There is a sense of "moral outrage" expressed that entire systems of Newtonian physics are considered refuted simply because the ether was allegedly disproven, while the "strange" assumptions of modernism remain the standard . Ultimately, the sources advocate for a mechanical-classical understanding of light, similar to the ball experiment, rather than relying on the "magical words" and unexplained mysteries of modern physics .