Is 'Star Trek (2009)' Really Trek? | RETROSPECTIVE (2 of 2)
So in my last video, I discussed everything that I think makes Star Trek 2009 a good movie, even a great movie. But there was still one question that I had to answer… Is Star Trek 2009 a good Star Trek movie? And that's an answer that everyone seems to have a different answer to depending on who you ask. For some this is to reliant on canon or not reliant enough on canon. Or it just doesn’t feel like old Trek, feeling too fast or too slow. So let's decide if Star Trek 2009 really is Star Trek. MY OTHER KELVIN TIMELINE RETROSPECTIVE VIDEOS • Star Trek Kelvin Timeline Retrospective ✔ Patreon: / jessiegender ✔ PayPal: https://paypal.me/jessiegender ✔ Twitch: / jessiegender ✔ Instagram: / jessiegender ✔ Twitter: / jessiegender ✔ Facebook: / jessie.gender1

Star Trek (2009) Is a Masterpiece | RETROSPECTIVE (1 of 2)

Star Trek Into Darkness Is (Almost) Great | RETROSPECTIVE

The Weird Legacy of Star Trek (2009)

Star Trek's Worst Video Game (& Other Kelvin Tie-In Media) | RETROSPECTIVE

Star Trek Beyond Is Top Tier Star Trek | RETROSPECTIVE

Everything Idiocracy Predicted That Came True

How Star Trek: Picard Ruins Star Trek

Why The Empire Strikes Back Is The Greatest Sequel Ever Made

Reflecting on the Kelvin Timeline's Legacy

Top 20 Most Quotable Monty Python Moments

Ranking Every Star Trek Movie (& No, Khan isn't #1)

Sir Patrick Stewart's Shakespearean Approach To Jean-Luc Picard | Conan O'Brien Needs A Friend

Why Spock’s Sexuality is so Dang Controversial (SEX IN STAR TREK BONUS)

The Brilliance of Star Trek: First Contact

15 Forgotten 80s Sci‑Fi Movies That Still Hold Up in 2026

Everything GREAT About Star Trek! (2009)

Neil Ranks Depictions of Aliens in Sci-Fi

Star Trek Into Darkness Retrospective/Review - Star Trek Retrospective, Part 17

